From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 2/2] bpf: make tcp_tso_autosize() available to BPF congestion controls
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 16:31:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825163153.D128E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824163139.990734-3-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Type confusion in `tcp_tso_autosize` leading to out-of-bounds read when called with a non-TCP socket from BPF.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v8 net-next 2/2] bpf: make tcp_tso_autosize() available to BPF congestion controls ---
commit 6f535d3aed5d0c1f1117963d858318f7f63354f5
Author: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com>
bpf: make tcp_tso_autosize() available to BPF congestion controls
Expose tcp_tso_autosize() as a BPF kfunc and register it in the TCP
congestion-control kfunc set. This allows BPF congestion controls to
reuse the kernel TSO autosizing logic while applying their own
minimum TSO segment policy.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> index ed4fea98dfde1..9deed2244c2de 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, tcp_reno_cong_avoid)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, tcp_reno_undo_cwnd)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, tcp_slow_start)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, tcp_cong_avoid_ai)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, tcp_tso_autosize)
> BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_tcp_ca_check_kfunc_ids)
>
> static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_tcp_ca_kfunc_set = {
[Severity: High]
Does this allow non-TCP struct_ops programs to call tcp_tso_autosize()?
Because bpf_tcp_ca_kfunc_set lacks a .filter callback, it appears this kfunc
becomes callable by any BPF program that can access a generic struct sock,
such as a bpf_qdisc program.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index 7d3e0e715c4bf..a98036bcd987e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2252,13 +2252,21 @@ static bool tcp_nagle_check(bool partial, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
> * in bigger TSO bursts. We we cut the RTT-based allowance in half
> * for every 2^9 usec (aka 512 us) of RTT, so that the RTT-based allowance
> * is below 1500 bytes after 6 * ~500 usec = 3ms.
> + *
> + * The min_tso_segs is floored to 1 to avoid surprising conversion. Also,
> + * BPF callers may pass mss_now == 0. In that case the function returns the
> + * sanitized min_tso_segs value and skips autosizing.
> */
> -u32 tcp_tso_autosize(const struct sock *sk, unsigned int mss_now,
> - int min_tso_segs)
> +__bpf_kfunc u32 tcp_tso_autosize(const struct sock *sk, unsigned int mss_now,
> + int min_tso_segs)
> {
> + u32 min_tso = max(min_tso_segs, 1);
> unsigned long bytes;
> u32 r;
>
> + if (unlikely(!mss_now))
> + return min_tso;
> +
> bytes = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_rate) >> READ_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_shift);
>
> r = tcp_min_rtt(tcp_sk(sk)) >> READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_tso_rtt_log);
[Severity: High]
If a non-TCP BPF program passes a generic struct sock to this kfunc, can this
lead to an out-of-bounds read?
The tcp_sk() macro casts the generic struct sock to a struct tcp_sock without
validating the socket type. If a smaller socket structure (like struct udp_sock)
is passed, accessing tp->rtt_min in tcp_min_rtt() could read past the end of
the allocated socket structure.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824163139.990734-1-chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 16:31 [PATCH v8 net-next 0/2] Explicit TSO segment count chia-yu.chang
2026-08-24 16:31 ` [PATCH v8 net-next 1/2] tcp: Replace min_tso_segs() with tso_segs() CC callback chia-yu.chang
2026-08-24 16:31 ` [PATCH v8 net-next 2/2] bpf: make tcp_tso_autosize() available to BPF congestion controls chia-yu.chang
2026-08-25 16:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-26 12:23 ` Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia)
2026-08-24 18:08 ` [PATCH v8 net-next 0/2] Explicit TSO segment count Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-24 20:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-24 20:09 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-24 20:21 ` Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia)
2026-08-24 20:26 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825163153.D128E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox