From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 07/16] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 22:47:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831224752.8AF4F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831202251.305046-8-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `atomic64_cond_read_*_timeout` uses non-atomic torn reads on 32-bit platforms.
--
commit 973deb7b74ff51cb72dbcdb0e4ee3a04554587b4
Author: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout()
This commit adds atomic load wrappers, atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() and
atomic64_cond_read_*_timeout() for the cond-load timeout interfaces. It also
adds a short description for the atomic_cond_read_{relaxed,acquire}(), and
the atomic_cond_read_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() interfaces.
> diff --git a/include/linux/atomic.h b/include/linux/atomic.h
> index 8dd57c3a99e9b..5bcb86e077845 100644
> --- a/include/linux/atomic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/atomic.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -31,6 +31,16 @@
> #define atomic64_cond_read_acquire(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire(&(v)->counter, (c))
> #define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed(v, c) smp_cond_load_relaxed(&(v)->counter, (c))
>
> +#define atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +#define atomic_cond_read_relaxed_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +
> +#define atomic64_cond_read_acquire_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code result in non-atomic torn
reads on 32-bit platforms?
When a caller uses atomic64_cond_read_acquire_timeout() or
atomic64_cond_read_relaxed_timeout() on a 32-bit architecture using
CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64, smp_cond_load_* executes a lockless
READ_ONCE(&(v)->counter). This causes the compiler to emit two 32-bit loads.
If generic_atomic64_add() or an interrupt handler modifies the value under a
spinlock concurrently, the read can tear. Evaluating loop conditions against
this corrupted memory could lead to spurious wakeups and returning torn,
inconsistent 64-bit values to the caller, silently breaking synchronization
logic.
The patch replicates this pre-existing flaw from atomic64_cond_read_acquire()
into the new timeout variants rather than utilizing the lock-protected
atomic64_read().
> +#define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831202251.305046-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 20:22 [PATCH v15 00/16] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 01/16] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 02/16] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 3:55 ` Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 03/16] arm64/delay: move, fixup usecs_to_cycles() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 22:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 04/16] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 22:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 05/16] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 06/16] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 07/16] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 22:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 08/16] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 09/16] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 10/16] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:31 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 11/16] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 12/16] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 23:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:46 ` Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 13/16] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 23:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:53 ` Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 14/16] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:17 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 15/16] barrier: timeout validity checks for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-08-31 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-31 20:22 ` [PATCH v15 16/16] barrier: timeout validity checks for smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831224752.8AF4F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox