From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: tj@kernel.org, arighi@nvidia.com
Cc: void@manifault.com, changwoo@igalia.com, michalblk@google.com,
liwanwu@kylinos.cn, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
cui.tao@linux.dev, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] sched_ext: document and enforce vtime ordering constraints
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 22:03:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901140343.764080-1-cui.tao@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Patch 1 documents the rolling-cursor and half-range requirement for
dsq_vtime ordering in scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime(). Patch 2 fixes
scx_flatcg's comparator to use the cyclic comparison, which is
correct there because cgrp_cap_budget() upholds that requirement.
Changes since v1:
- drop 1/2 (kernel priq comparator change): the cyclic ordering is
the documented contract; a plain comparison causes unbounded
starvation at the natural wrap (Andrea, Tejun)
- new 1/2: document the rolling-cursor requirement instead (Tejun)
- 2/2 (flatcg) unchanged
Tao Cui (2):
sched_ext: document the rolling-cursor requirement for dsq_vtime
sched_ext/scx_flatcg: make cgv_node_less() wraparound-safe
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 5 +++++
tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 14:03 Tao Cui [this message]
2026-09-01 14:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched_ext: document the rolling-cursor requirement for dsq_vtime Tao Cui
2026-09-01 19:59 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-01 14:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_ext/scx_flatcg: make cgv_node_less() wraparound-safe Tao Cui
2026-09-01 14:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-02 1:21 ` Tao Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901140343.764080-1-cui.tao@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwanwu@kylinos.cn \
--cc=michalblk@google.com \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox