BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ricardo Robaina" <rrobaina@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] parisc: pass pt_regs to audit_syscall_entry()
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:01:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902150130.56B981F00ADB@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83d9a03e1fa526aef9f2ecac704c118a156401d7.1788351089.git.rrobaina@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Removal of explicit 32-bit masking for compat syscall arguments allows a ptracer to bypass audit filters and leaks upper 32 bits into audit logs.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Seccomp evaluates unmasked 64-bit register values for 32-bit compat tasks, allowing bypass of reject filters.
--

commit 78cafbbd76943b4c2f06e1817363e637bd633afe
Author: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>

parisc: pass pt_regs to audit_syscall_entry()

This commit changes audit_syscall_entry() to take a pointer to pt_regs
and extract the syscall arguments itself via syscall_get_arguments(). The
individual argument registers are dropped from the call.

> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 1d9e210702e1f..948e0cf29ba47 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -359,15 +359,10 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>  	if (!is_compat_task())
> -		audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20], regs->gr[26], regs->gr[25],
> -				    regs->gr[24], regs->gr[23]);
> +		audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20], regs);
>  	else
>  #endif
> -		audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20] & 0xffffffff,
> -			regs->gr[26] & 0xffffffff,
> -			regs->gr[25] & 0xffffffff,
> -			regs->gr[24] & 0xffffffff,
> -			regs->gr[23] & 0xffffffff);
> +		audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20] & 0xffffffff, regs);

[Severity: High]
Does removing the explicit 32-bit masking for compat syscall arguments allow
a ptracer to bypass audit filters?

Since audit_syscall_entry() now uses syscall_get_arguments() internally to
extract the registers, and syscall_get_arguments() does not truncate the
arguments to 32 bits on PARISC:

arch/parisc/include/asm/syscall.h:syscall_get_arguments() {
	args[5] = regs->gr[21];
	args[4] = regs->gr[22];
	args[3] = regs->gr[23];
	args[2] = regs->gr[24];
	args[1] = regs->gr[25];
	args[0] = regs->gr[26];
}

An attacker in a 32-bit compat task could manipulate the upper 32 bits of
syscall argument registers via ptrace. Audit would evaluate the unmasked
64-bit values, while the syscall wrapper would truncate them to 32 bits,
potentially leading to an evasion of security audit logging.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does Seccomp also evaluate unmasked 64-bit
register values for 32-bit compat tasks on PARISC?

Seccomp relies on syscall_get_arguments() in populate_seccomp_data():

kernel/seccomp.c:populate_seccomp_data() {
	...
	syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, args);
	sd->args[0] = args[0];
	sd->args[1] = args[1];
	...
}

Because syscall_get_arguments() does not mask the upper 32 bits for compat
tasks, could an attacker bypass Seccomp reject filters by injecting 64-bit
values with garbage in the upper 32 bits before Seccomp evaluates them?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1788351089.git.rrobaina@redhat.com?part=9

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 14:43 [PATCH v2 00/13] audit: log all six syscall arguments in the SYSCALL record Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  8:21   ` Will Deacon
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] alpha: pass pt_regs to audit_syscall_entry() Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] arm: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] arm64: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  8:22   ` Will Deacon
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] csky: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] microblaze: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] mips: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] openrisc: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] parisc: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] sh: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] sparc64: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] um: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] xtensa: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:02   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902150130.56B981F00ADB@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rrobaina@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox