From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ricardo Robaina" <rrobaina@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] parisc: pass pt_regs to audit_syscall_entry()
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:01:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902150130.56B981F00ADB@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83d9a03e1fa526aef9f2ecac704c118a156401d7.1788351089.git.rrobaina@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Removal of explicit 32-bit masking for compat syscall arguments allows a ptracer to bypass audit filters and leaks upper 32 bits into audit logs.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Seccomp evaluates unmasked 64-bit register values for 32-bit compat tasks, allowing bypass of reject filters.
--
commit 78cafbbd76943b4c2f06e1817363e637bd633afe
Author: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
parisc: pass pt_regs to audit_syscall_entry()
This commit changes audit_syscall_entry() to take a pointer to pt_regs
and extract the syscall arguments itself via syscall_get_arguments(). The
individual argument registers are dropped from the call.
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 1d9e210702e1f..948e0cf29ba47 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -359,15 +359,10 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> if (!is_compat_task())
> - audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20], regs->gr[26], regs->gr[25],
> - regs->gr[24], regs->gr[23]);
> + audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20], regs);
> else
> #endif
> - audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20] & 0xffffffff,
> - regs->gr[26] & 0xffffffff,
> - regs->gr[25] & 0xffffffff,
> - regs->gr[24] & 0xffffffff,
> - regs->gr[23] & 0xffffffff);
> + audit_syscall_entry(regs->gr[20] & 0xffffffff, regs);
[Severity: High]
Does removing the explicit 32-bit masking for compat syscall arguments allow
a ptracer to bypass audit filters?
Since audit_syscall_entry() now uses syscall_get_arguments() internally to
extract the registers, and syscall_get_arguments() does not truncate the
arguments to 32 bits on PARISC:
arch/parisc/include/asm/syscall.h:syscall_get_arguments() {
args[5] = regs->gr[21];
args[4] = regs->gr[22];
args[3] = regs->gr[23];
args[2] = regs->gr[24];
args[1] = regs->gr[25];
args[0] = regs->gr[26];
}
An attacker in a 32-bit compat task could manipulate the upper 32 bits of
syscall argument registers via ptrace. Audit would evaluate the unmasked
64-bit values, while the syscall wrapper would truncate them to 32 bits,
potentially leading to an evasion of security audit logging.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does Seccomp also evaluate unmasked 64-bit
register values for 32-bit compat tasks on PARISC?
Seccomp relies on syscall_get_arguments() in populate_seccomp_data():
kernel/seccomp.c:populate_seccomp_data() {
...
syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, args);
sd->args[0] = args[0];
sd->args[1] = args[1];
...
}
Because syscall_get_arguments() does not mask the upper 32 bits for compat
tasks, could an attacker bypass Seccomp reject filters by injecting 64-bit
values with garbage in the upper 32 bits before Seccomp evaluates them?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1788351089.git.rrobaina@redhat.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 14:43 [PATCH v2 00/13] audit: log all six syscall arguments in the SYSCALL record Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 8:21 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] alpha: pass pt_regs to audit_syscall_entry() Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] arm: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] arm64: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 8:22 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] csky: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] microblaze: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] mips: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] openrisc: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] parisc: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] sh: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] sparc64: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] um: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] xtensa: " Ricardo Robaina
2026-09-02 15:02 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902150130.56B981F00ADB@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrobaina@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox