From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/4] net: stmmac: propagate PTP init failures in stmmac_setup_ptp()
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:18:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903201825.98F331F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-stmmac-est-reapply-after-open-v3-1-e72a6df5a7ef@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Propagating stmmac_init_timestamping() return value causes network interface open/resume to fail on hardware without PTP support.
--
commit 9136103951651df9ef9668b2743b64e0da023618
Author: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
net: stmmac: propagate PTP init failures in stmmac_setup_ptp()
This patch modifies stmmac_setup_ptp() to return an error code instead of
swallowing PTP setup failures. This ensures that failures like a broken
reference clock prevent the schedule from getting stuck during taprio offload.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index d576059c04df9..47295845371aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -937,18 +937,27 @@ static int stmmac_init_timestamping(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void stmmac_setup_ptp(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> +static int stmmac_setup_ptp(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> {
> int ret;
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->plat->clk_ptp_ref);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> netdev_warn(priv->dev,
> "failed to enable PTP reference clock: %pe\n",
> ERR_PTR(ret));
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = stmmac_init_timestamping(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->plat->clk_ptp_ref);
> + return ret;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this unexpectedly propagate a failure when the MAC hardware lacks PTP
capabilities?
In stmmac_init_timestamping(), if the hardware does not support PTP, it
returns -EOPNOTSUPP:
if (!(priv->dma_cap.time_stamp || priv->dma_cap.atime_stamp)) {
netdev_info(priv->dev, "PTP not supported by HW\n");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
By returning this error here, will it prevent devices without PTP support
from initializing correctly?
> +
> + stmmac_ptp_register(priv);
>
> - if (stmmac_init_timestamping(priv) == 0)
> - stmmac_ptp_register(priv);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void stmmac_release_ptp(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> @@ -4153,10 +4162,12 @@ static int __stmmac_open(struct net_device *dev,
> ret = stmmac_hw_setup(dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> netdev_err(priv->dev, "%s: Hw setup failed\n", __func__);
> - goto init_error;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - stmmac_setup_ptp(priv);
> + ret = stmmac_setup_ptp(priv);
> + if (ret)
> + goto ptp_error;
[Severity: High]
Could propagating the -EOPNOTSUPP return value cause the network interface
bring-up to fail completely?
Prior to this patch, stmmac_setup_ptp() ignored the return value, allowing
non-PTP hardware to seamlessly skip PTP setup. Since the error is now handled,
it seems like bringing up the interface (e.g., via ip link set up) will jump
to ptp_error and abort the open process for hardware without PTP.
[ ... ]
> @@ -8318,13 +8330,12 @@ int stmmac_resume(struct device *dev)
> ret = stmmac_hw_setup(ndev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> netdev_err(priv->dev, "%s: Hw setup failed\n", __func__);
> - stmmac_legacy_serdes_power_down(priv);
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> - rtnl_unlock();
> - return ret;
> + goto error_unlock;
> }
>
> - stmmac_init_timestamping(priv);
> + ret = stmmac_init_timestamping(priv);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_stop_dma;
[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a similar issue during system resume?
If stmmac_init_timestamping() returns -EOPNOTSUPP for hardware lacking PTP,
this looks like it will abort the resume process and leave the interface
broken after the system wakes up.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902-stmmac-est-reapply-after-open-v3-0-e72a6df5a7ef@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 20:15 [PATCH net v3 0/4] net: stmmac: re-apply taprio offload in __stmmac_open() and stmmac_resume() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-02 20:15 ` [PATCH net v3 1/4] net: stmmac: propagate PTP init failures in stmmac_setup_ptp() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-02 20:59 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-02 21:23 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-02 22:16 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-09-02 22:24 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-03 20:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 20:15 ` [PATCH net v3 2/4] net: stmmac: embed struct stmmac_est in stmmac_priv struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-02 20:15 ` [PATCH net v3 3/4] net: stmmac: pass the desired EST enable state to est_configure() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-02 20:15 ` [PATCH net v3 4/4] net: stmmac: re-apply taprio offload in __stmmac_open() and stmmac_resume() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-03 20:18 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903201825.98F331F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox