From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 5/8] bpf: Clear NON_OWN_REF after RCU protection ends
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 10:43:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904084325.52250-6-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904084325.52250-1-memxor@gmail.com>
A local kptr load of an object containing a graph node is marked MEM_RCU
and NON_OWN_REF while protected by RCU. When the last RCU read-side critical
section ends, invalidate_rcu_protected_refs() removes MEM_RCU and marks the
pointer PTR_UNTRUSTED, but leaves NON_OWN_REF set.
The stale flag lets graph kfunc argument checks continue treating the
pointer as a live borrowed reference. In particular, bpf_rbtree_remove()
can accept a pointer after its protection ended and return it as a new
owning reference, even though the object may already have been freed.
Clear NON_OWN_REF when an RCU-protected pointer is demoted. A spin lock also
provides implicit RCU protection, so invalidate non-owning references before
demoting RCU-protected pointers when releasing the lock. Otherwise the
demotion would clear the flag before invalidate_non_owning_refs() can find
and invalidate those aliases.
The demoted pointer remains available for fault-protected reads. Exempt such
reads from the allocated-object reference-state assertion; writes through a
fault-prone pointer are already rejected, and bpf_may_fault_on_deref() makes
the surviving loads use BPF_PROBE_MEM.
Fixes: 1b12171533a9 ("bpf: Mark direct ld of stashed bpf_{rb,list}_node as non-owning ref")
Reported-by: Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>
Suggested-by: Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bc0abf96cc89..56a10f79f9a8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6038,7 +6038,13 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return -EACCES;
}
- if (type_is_alloc(reg->type) && !type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type) &&
+ /*
+ * A fault-prone allocated object may still be read through a
+ * BPF_PROBE_MEM load after its lifetime protection ends. Writes
+ * through such pointers were rejected above.
+ */
+ if (type_is_alloc(reg->type) && !bpf_may_fault_on_deref(reg->type) &&
+ !type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type) &&
!(reg->type & MEM_RCU) && !reg_is_referenced(env, reg)) {
verifier_bug(env, "allocated object must have a referenced id");
return -EFAULT;
@@ -7416,10 +7422,14 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /*
+ * Invalidate non-owning refs before RCU demotion clears their
+ * NON_OWN_REF flag.
+ */
+ invalidate_non_owning_refs(env);
+
if (!in_rcu_cs(env))
invalidate_rcu_protected_refs(env);
-
- invalidate_non_owning_refs(env);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -9519,7 +9529,7 @@ static void invalidate_rcu_protected_refs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate_mask(env->cur_state, state, reg, stack, clear_mask, ({
if (reg->type & MEM_RCU) {
bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, reg, NULL, BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
- reg->type &= ~(MEM_RCU | PTR_MAYBE_NULL);
+ reg->type &= ~(MEM_RCU | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | NON_OWN_REF);
reg->type |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;
bpf_diag_mod_end(env);
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 8:43 [PATCH bpf v2 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 3 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 8:43 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/8] bpf: Require MEM_PERCPU for percpu kptr stores Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 8:43 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/8] selftests/bpf: Reject non-percpu values in percpu kptr fields Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 8:43 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/8] bpf: Keep refcount_acquire nullable for borrowed RCU kptrs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 8:43 ` [PATCH bpf v2 4/8] selftests/bpf: Test borrowed refcount acquisition nullability Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 9:47 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-04 8:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-04 8:43 ` [PATCH bpf v2 6/8] selftests/bpf: Reject graph kptr use after RCU unlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 8:43 ` [PATCH bpf v2 7/8] bpf: Reject untrusted allocated-object pointers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 8:43 ` [PATCH bpf v2 8/8] selftests/bpf: Reject refcount acquisition after RCU unlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 15:00 ` [PATCH bpf v2 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 3 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904084325.52250-6-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=npc@anthropic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox