From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882681F1932; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 19:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788551996; cv=none; b=t3di+LTXsfhDScbN+mf0J55DbMtyLxfvyP+kHyXGtV0tXcUCXvJCJHf8yb63R4rKrDzkd/T60yEXKFjlzRhPyD1MxyMLskYwzRt5K9ZkJBhfho7dznoy9teMaXdhkpMm0ymcY4N/nsRvKXXyeTzlgvE8x1fL6KKkDVDSgStYkrI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788551996; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AqvRX19FxBFQP7yASaLK1UV7nmZyyzamgPwH0W5lt9M=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=e+HxrMmyuqkq4hq988SJf/mM+5UopEnJD1l/ZhdKRxNGDDVnyTDNznkAH2RA8aaqsO5GjwcugnsI3NTkQNnhTL9QmzJn4byxw8x4Nl8Zxpimn2R2wkB4Yfcyc5zJat5uEle1AswC8D1UTGDh9Sc/HOC9jqoEqtTltDbja0+Bq4w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=L4VCGw/O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="L4VCGw/O" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D9701F00A3D; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 19:59:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788551994; bh=AqvRX19FxBFQP7yASaLK1UV7nmZyyzamgPwH0W5lt9M=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=L4VCGw/O7E7V/me3kBmkLn5SC2oddHbo79WeKgmujEvXlzQlb0jPq6Qln8CD9Q/Nk i44rgqAF2tYcKYCvF9hdTjOuXWmjizEbM6CBRZNbGLrbNU/i+TZKb0VBhIn8tst32J +rfmJk9pTZLiGcsi/uAr/YNbM29u49GxLkNy8oFSRyGF8MPwOhZE609WXn5DMBpIDC PtdgXwDaLlnO6fQTjfCU3pp/E4a94fw8rmzKpPaPXTj3MCOGV6RU0TQfRJBMKy2U9c vvyOkPwDmib9hOfemrVpDmLuD+29HYNauv7UhIHqtcGOr64WZqaOVFLQc1p4yjtccX Tl8I6RCDb8hNw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/7] bpf, s390: Use resolved pointer for timed may_goto Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Siddharth Chintamaneni" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20260904195132.141068-7-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> References: <20260904195132.141068-1-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> <20260904195132.141068-7-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 19:59:53 +0000 Message-Id: <20260904195953.9D9701F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The timed may_goto fixup now passes the resolved counter pointer through > BPF_REG_AX instead of a stack offset and BPF frame pointer pair. >=20 > Copy the pointer directly into the first argument register and update the > special calling convention documentation. >=20 > Fixes: b8efa810c1db ("s390/bpf: Add s390 JIT support for timed may_goto") > Reported-by: Jeremy Jean > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260824213158.3755932-2-Jeremy.Jean@os= s.cyber.gouv.fr/ > Assisted-by: Copilot:gpt-5.6-sol > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Chintamaneni Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904195132.1410= 68-1-sidchintamaneni@gmail.com?part=3D6