From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/22] bpf: Drop redundant BTF pointer helper write rejection
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 15:01:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905220117.922028-17-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905220117.922028-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
check_reg_type() rejects a trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID admitted by
mem_types unless the argument carries MEM_RDONLY. This duplicates
argument-specific memory access validation and is too conservative for
map keys and input map values, whose read direction is not represented
by MEM_RDONLY.
Since commit fa75b7c85b0d ("bpf: Enforce write checks for BTF pointer
helper access"), check_helper_mem_access() forwards the requested access
type to check_ptr_to_btf_access(). Map keys always request read access.
Map values request write access only when tagged with MEM_WRITE.
ARG_PTR_TO_MEM prototypes must carry either MEM_RDONLY or MEM_WRITE,
and size arguments use the direction of their associated memory
argument. btf_struct_access() therefore checks the effective access
direction in every case.
Drop the early rejection and keep check_reg_type() limited to register
admission.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1f5f975c73a7..09a51d67ab7e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -8469,16 +8469,8 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *re
if (base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID)
return 0;
- if (compatible == &mem_types) {
- if (!(arg_type & MEM_RDONLY)) {
- verbose(env,
- "%s() may write into memory pointed by %s type=%s\n",
- meta->func_name,
- reg_arg_name(env, argno), reg_type_str(env, reg->type));
- return -EACCES;
- }
+ if (compatible == &mem_types)
return 0;
- }
switch ((int)reg->type) {
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-05 22:00 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc argument checks Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/22] bpf: Pass call metadata through shared " Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/22] bpf: Address check_func_arg() arguments by argno Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 17:37 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/22] bpf: Only compare func_id against BPF_FUNC_* for helper calls Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/22] bpf: Only compare func_id against kfunc BTF IDs for kfunc calls Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 17:47 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/22] bpf: Rename ambiguous function argument types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 17:54 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/22] bpf: Unify kfunc argument kinds with enum bpf_arg_type Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:04 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/22] bpf: Align helper and kfunc ARG_PTR_TO_PROG_AUX handling Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:23 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/22] bpf: Classify kfunc arguments the verifier ignores Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:27 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/22] bpf: Set OBJ_RELEASE when generating kfunc argument types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/22] bpf: Set MEM_UNINIT and dynptr subtypes when generating kfunc arg types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/22] bpf: Set MEM_RCU when generating kfunc argument types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:41 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/22] bpf: Resolve BTF ID of ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID in kfunc bpf_func_proto Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 20:42 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/22] bpf: Resolve ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_FIXED_SIZE size " Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/22] bpf: Consolidate runtime argument type resolution Amery Hung
2026-09-10 21:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-11 21:01 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/22] bpf: Consolidate nullable argument validation Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-09-05 23:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/22] bpf: Drop redundant BTF pointer helper write rejection bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 20:48 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/22] bpf: Consolidate helper and kfunc PTR_TO_BTF_ID argument matching Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 18/22] bpf: Admit kfunc argument registers through check_reg_type() Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:23 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-10 16:18 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 19/22] selftests/bpf: Test kfunc packet memory direct writes Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11 20:46 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 20/22] bpf: Consolidate function call pkt_access validation Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 21/22] bpf: Consolidate release argument validation Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11 20:47 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 22/22] bpf: Check helper and kfunc arguments in one path Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:59 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-10 21:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-11 20:55 ` Amery Hung
2026-09-12 3:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc argument checks patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260905220117.922028-17-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox