BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matt Turner" <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] perf tools: make the GTK4 report browser actually loadable at runtime
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:12:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906161258.998461F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906-perf-gtk2-v3-2-e1f2086214a0@gmail.com>

> perf report --gtk dlopen()s libperf-gtk.so and expects it to resolve
> symbols back against the running perf binary (callchain_param,
> symbol_conf, evsel__name, and friends all live in perf itself, not in
> the plugin). Two things stood in the way of that after the GTK 2 to GTK
> 4 port:
> 
> perf never passed -rdynamic, so none of its own symbols were in its
> dynamic symbol table for a dlopen()ed plugin to find at all. Add
> -rdynamic to LDFLAGS when GTK4 support is enabled.
> 
> annotated_source__hist_entry() was a static inline in annotate.h, so
> ui/gtk/annotate.c calling it pulled hashmap__find()'s expansion,
> hashmap_find(), directly into libperf-gtk.so as an undefined symbol. The
> only hashmap_find perf links against in the common case is libbpf's
> internal one (tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.c), which libbpf compiles with
> -fvisibility=hidden; a hidden symbol can never be exported to a
> dlopen()ed plugin no matter what LDFLAGS perf itself gets. Move
> annotated_source__hist_entry() out of the header and into annotate.c, as
> an ordinary exported function, so the plugin depends on it the same way
> it already depends on evsel__group_desc() and friends, instead of
> reaching for hashmap_find directly.
> 
> With both fixes, a default 'make GTK4=1' build (libbpf statically
> linked, as usual) can dlopen() libperf-gtk.so and open the report
> browser without needing NO_LIBBPF=1 or manual LDFLAGS. Verified with
> perf report --gtk against a real perf.data on an actual GTK4 desktop
> session.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260906-perf-gtk2-v3-0-e1f2086214a0@gmail.com?part=2


      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-06 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-06 16:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] perf tools: port UI from GTK2 to GTK4 Matt Turner
2026-09-06 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] tools: port perf ui from GTK 2 to GTK 4 Matt Turner
2026-09-06 16:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf tools: make the GTK4 report browser actually loadable at runtime Matt Turner
2026-09-06 16:12   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260906161258.998461F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox