From: Tianyi Chen <hi@tychen.cc>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tianyi Chen <hi@tychen.cc>, Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpftool: Support symbolic map creation flags
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 01:07:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906170715.1212085-1-hi@tychen.cc> (raw)
This series adds comma-separated BPF_F_* names to map create flags,
while retaining base-0 numeric input. It also documents the syntax,
completes names within lists, and tests the resulting kernel map flags
and invalid-input diagnostics.
This addresses the map creation part of:
https://github.com/libbpf/bpftool/issues/57
The series is based on bpf-next and is independent of the ring buffer
and batch-dump series sent alongside it.
Validation:
- Full bpftool build and focused BPF selftests build with LLVM 20.
- All 29 bpftool_map_flags subtests passed in an x86-64 KVM guest
running Linux 7.3.0-rc1, using a bpftool built with only this series.
- Bash syntax and actual completion candidates checked with and without
comma in COMP_WORDBREAKS; bpftool-map man page generated successfully.
Only focused BPF tests were run; this does not claim a full BPF selftest
suite run. Strict checkpatch has no errors or checks; its new-file
warning is covered by the existing BPF/selftests MAINTAINERS patterns.
Integration check: these three independent series also applied and built
together with my previously posted recursive map-dump v2 series. The
combined 64 subtests passed with no skips or failures in the same guest.
Tianyi Chen (2):
bpftool: Accept symbolic map creation flags
selftests/bpf: Cover symbolic bpftool map creation flags
.../bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst | 13 ++-
tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 25 ++++-
tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 77 ++++++++++++++-
.../bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_map_flags.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_map_flags.c
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 17:07 Tianyi Chen [this message]
2026-09-06 17:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpftool: Accept symbolic map creation flags Tianyi Chen
2026-09-06 18:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-06 17:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover symbolic bpftool " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 1:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpftool: Support symbolic " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 1:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpftool: Accept " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 1:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover symbolic bpftool " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 2:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpftool: Support symbolic " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Accept " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 4:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 5:14 ` Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover symbolic bpftool " Tianyi Chen
[not found] ` <88e01da6d4b68aae7b8df6c0956b78f082bcedab7eb588631405031f1425b146@mail.kernel.org>
2026-09-07 5:15 ` [bpf-next,v3,1/2] bpftool: Accept symbolic " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-11 2:53 ` Tianyi Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906170715.1212085-1-hi@tychen.cc \
--to=hi@tychen.cc \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox