From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF69246762; Mon, 7 Sep 2026 03:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788751614; cv=none; b=C/NGf8PGFMwQUlRt4sW+UGQiq4qrmtJtffaHhP8QsYx5sCsW1iQui5C0gmtcZjwJPGW4vy5EdK5VxVGO4C5TyphAoLy8iP4Obr/OsUnvB+9cS/fHi/ljXZc8IOzHsgXHsYC0rcQHywJ57TRogNCnk3bgM8PzcY3MhxoCuIdkAx0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788751614; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jlOQ0n2PNhuPIh1KarKCVTN6XuHIkDQKRI5gKjnrtrk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=emSF9s6YNwVjaAhsmJj2BLNKm01UJYvS4AxTfV9oWc8WhJI1fmR8Xx63ANvCpNA2E/p7G26ooW3Rdju0fy7mOjzRXb6PTLnpLxKUqCo6ibpgDdaRwwlyoi9RTSIuB9NrpNw0tqa/pxtYS9h/dmEYGColhVnhHINPM8t4RpXdnMM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=eQfA+2WK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="eQfA+2WK" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1788751609; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=jlOQ0n2PNhuPIh1KarKCVTN6XuHIkDQKRI5gKjnrtrk=; b=eQfA+2WKnt0jjYvooW61tRh/rXMxO1Gt3DXt3AYSWFLl7uKWgazdQ1Z988owe9r/yhIICNQYnotrxaUDeF5U60mkM4I7Nh52uVhFna4iLkzTdUnRe0F+dIZ5r+0U8KroRe/HShc9GTBWLq9i6yNY/ICyosdsMOAwM6B8kojrsyg= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R151e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam011083073210;MF=cp0613@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=21;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0XAOUcAG_1788751605; Received: from DESKTOP-S9E58SO.localdomain(mailfrom:cp0613@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0XAOUcAG_1788751605 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 11:26:49 +0800 From: Chen Pei To: Pu Lehui , ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, bjorn@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org Cc: ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, shuah@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, riscv: Register extable entries at probe insn call sites Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 11:26:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20260907023000.16104-1-reply-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <7fbae9ac-44e4-4607-8aba-15db9779f80d@huawei.com> References: <20260901120013.16104-1-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> <7fbae9ac-44e4-4607-8aba-15db9779f80d@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > This patch looks fine, but I still tend not to introduce these changes. > I think the function itself should handle its own defensive checks, and > we should also avoid "shotgun surgery". Indeed, you have a point. Thanks for the review. Best regards, Pei