From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com (mail-pj1-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C2F36F8E9 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 06:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788847719; cv=none; b=QDrEiH9908E6q9flRc8PacB1IxndXgQlUKC2BgSvLhA+AXKzbrq9+0SjQWIdWn6kL4pk52GutXfLS0o9s86+rVNxaevZlj9uGwIPgNU4rIbHUcIFphwpx3XmfWKGeSQWYRUxehZ4SnOZd1t1GCTr+bUV5g4W8Zv/wXlBTNVBQD4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788847719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uCmsMBCDrsY2CSXZlcugqtfnFjXUOVptSDX6rZ54Kqo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=R9kSxQUeeHkbJkmsM+lQlMYqkN2BWGEijk/IkYJPZ60tNf/CbVUN8CJS/OSxVA6lZWUgFxraFlaEgRm/PjYnH6e7D7kg4COKWclVpnO8/yFaQ2ULuJSP8HFffiwQsbxxe3gw/8e4Gs4UNkGa8Y+S8bY0moc4NgzNncrM/EBXyx4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=fJPcHTEB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fJPcHTEB" Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38dfe910e9dso4604122a91.3 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 23:08:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1788847718; x=1789452518; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=PazSmK9CIewfru0eTOp5da7ZxmX1DEtx5wd1EeqAqF8=; b=fJPcHTEB8SvlLcT1XcxoLogknt1QB+63j5RrVzAZ21dPjSd45y8DUKsNSbt6qLfrhF HPsOhFLh8rvJ0AtGNTHHkFHTkVorZSh8bWFQtOsxdCc7j8H/GN0juZdheGHZyFiOY675 Rxua74SQl6tlldD0syTxw0o0h0wlwl45uyXEha77S2tDsfoWvzFzOsPpk5Xtr9/EBesm OrkaBOo581EbXDEFlJlddsvAINS20ix6z7MctwFNpuXI+bu8jIQ/gsRCeT7I8F4fHo9g El73brS044KPaNQqa2Ayx3Q/3Pcf45nDD+ZbD1hvNms6sZbH5Aykdq52gqVdGXDfw7Up 9DBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1788847718; x=1789452518; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=PazSmK9CIewfru0eTOp5da7ZxmX1DEtx5wd1EeqAqF8=; b=UgsoVDK9oxTGyj7TgMkuMdkXlGNnBs+m5QboT2WuoQyy8cQ6GhCsukK261PKguB4uF KeuNnZbkW1kFaaIGcAfUYKHoecbwAXh96VDpNzpD1JP3Lv7a9cX79b0bNQwpozyZgfU2 EGq3d/aKWTw6ruIeCL9p2XDsNMy4+TrNUjrBM3NNGa709CKUrVbSV3ihDnAGv132SZKT qQMlTxD0oO94t0iRbge/N4HTjF8W1b70xeOwF2cB00BfFVRsl4TbblLkpSazjA6oYXZ1 4iehDEVsa6CXsrlZEkj79Qg2gNe6vsWmC6/RRJcvO+G4ecPtUiqbvDibOZo7ST2+cg9y N6/A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBzGg3PIwGE/9CygChw+uIFFUc/qgMCNIbZGThhQLc9iEm+AKyhwX+8vD+LUgRka8Wv7RlM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++nSawOOB20UUV1vpYx2OrQlM1Uzcr8Jt5WTef8/WHf0JOjWVk9W mFBSIu6MkIJd4EuS+wyYT6ImX54y5ZPqPjMUT4as6/4XcD/tgLTGFuaP X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou1u9FuKpaqbYFUcP69lUWAXRJFeVDe+yJFnM6XPaVgPrjgQOFmle+g9CTrjhuN M/vrdSYl2gqla6ACrNxi5mViLQZle07W/lFOfAIbv6KyTZUpH+EBdGmhB82yPizE8QENWo2+Cue BgY99BhNWvIFNvVPYvjYUsru2Ecb+mwAhhjbjJqKWnxRMeVm/OAsDmY9NPoQ7ysFZpYUbMIbaVN eH8BGUcjQp1LTXAyUqoZEIULBBY19vcqYSPbeP7nRj6hqkAANzhEVuXmJsKKEAp50F91JvZ3d92 4B+HsIQDJSu+ljgA1OcKL9XU8Fl+Rg8/QCTIsketX43VmEzbRfVWDOogt9nSOLCzXbKRfrnI8Tr F2l4vQlPVD+RrR6q9UBwEeHLWtaxj2d72rAgckUZk8+pyQ+1KHCnoLTwiYDyitqmV33BkSnb8nE +IgMTI9eLlvczUzo/z21T9z0VonAhwTCT/ZPWzxqO/6RtEVIR5IcWxai/+v+qJGXuJFq/UcGS5W HEzov9eu5miBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:39ab:b0:398:9be8:ea68 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-39b261da75cmr41792101a91.21.1788847717793; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 23:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from volcano9f6e-hostos.amd.com ([165.204.217.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a92af1059eb24-14344a86512sm8501320c88.10.2026.09.07.23.08.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Sep 2026 23:08:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Hemanth Selam To: kernel-ci@meta.com Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Alexei Starovoitov , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] bpf: fix typos and repeated words in comments Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 11:38:32 +0530 Message-ID: <20260908060832.32175-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: <01b5453944b3f5259e123e7684a6b6acc60cab31bb258bc7dad31adc5e294984@mail.kernel.org> References: <20260908054853.13820-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com> <01b5453944b3f5259e123e7684a6b6acc60cab31bb258bc7dad31adc5e294984@mail.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 05:53:53AM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote: > CI has tested the following submission: > Status: CONFLICT > Name: [bpf-next,v4,0/7] bpf: fix typos and repeated words in comments > PR: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/13699 > > Please rebase your submission onto the most recent upstream change and resubmit > the patch to get it tested again. I resent this as v4 rebased onto bpf-next in response to the same report on v3, and it came back CONFLICT again, so I would rather ask than keep resending the same content. The series applies cleanly here on all three of: bpf-next master 1b7415bf70be kernel-patches/bpf bpf-next_base kernel-patches/bpf bpf-next with git am and no fuzz, all seven patches. Looking at the pull requests the bot opened, the base branch does not look like the bpf-next one: v2 PR 13680 base bpf_base head series/1159292=>bpf v3 PR 13685 base bpf-net_base head series/1159712=>bpf-net v4 PR 13699 base bpf-net_base head series/1160154=>bpf-net and all three report changed_files: 0, which suggests the series is not being applied rather than that it conflicts with something. The subject is tagged [PATCH bpf-next v4]. The series does touch arch/{arm,powerpc,sparc}/net/bpf_jit*, so if the target tree is picked up from the paths or from the "net:" in some of the patch subjects, that might be what is sending it to the bpf/net branches. Is there anything I should change on my side? Happy to retitle the arch patches or split them out if that helps the routing. Otherwise the content is unchanged from v3 and I would rather not post a v5 just to retrigger CI. Thanks, Hemanth