BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, liam@infradead.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/nommu: Reject wrapping ranges in access_remote_vm()
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 00:13:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909001341.6a7c3556259f7cf9a79c1da7@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909064231.18693-1-tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>

On Wed,  9 Sep 2026 09:42:31 +0300 Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com> wrote:

> The NOMMU implementation of access_process_vm() rejects address ranges
> whose end wraps around, but access_remote_vm() bypasses this check even
> though both functions delegate to __access_remote_vm().
> 
> Move the wraparound check into __access_remote_vm() so it applies to
> both entry points.

lgtm, thanks.

> This is originally reported in [1].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4ef240a5bea36ff84df9589671367832860795159386a4c8fba546a0fa8b786f@mail.kernel.org/

Ah, bpfbot scored one.

Sashiko might have found more issues in there:
	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909064231.18693-1-tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com

I'll optimistically cc Hajime Tazaki, who has been doing some NOMMU
work recently.

> Fixes: f55f199b7d76 ("NOMMU: implement access_remote_vm")
> Signed-off-by: Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/nommu.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> index 498e01ee40b0..ed44510e3770 100644
> --- a/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c
> @@ -1674,6 +1674,9 @@ static int __access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>  	int write = gup_flags & FOLL_WRITE;
>  
> +	if (addr + len < addr)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (mmap_read_lock_killable(mm))
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -1727,9 +1730,6 @@ int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, void *buf, in
>  {
>  	struct mm_struct *mm;
>  
> -	if (addr + len < addr)
> -		return 0;
> -
>  	mm = get_task_mm(tsk);
>  	if (!mm)
>  		return 0;
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  6:42 [PATCH] mm/nommu: Reject wrapping ranges in access_remote_vm() Anastasios Papagiannis
2026-09-09  6:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09  7:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-09-09 20:11   ` Hajime Tazaki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909001341.6a7c3556259f7cf9a79c1da7@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com \
    --cc=thehajime@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox