BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: ast@kernel.org
Cc: memxor@gmail.com, eddyz87@gmail.com, info@starlabs.sg,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf 3/4] bpf: Require CAP_PERFMON for untrusted read-only memory reads
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:21:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910142107.40582-3-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910142107.40582-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>

Marking bpf_rdonly_cast() KF_PERFMON CAP-limits one producer of PTR_TO_MEM |
MEM_RDONLY | PTR_UNTRUSTED, but not the type itself. A global subprogram
argument tagged __arg_untrusted results in the same register with no kfunc
call.

Fixes: c4aa454c64ae ("bpf: support for void/primitive __arg_untrusted global func params")
Reported-by: STAR Labs SG <info@starlabs.sg>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 5d61e74865a8..3f99b20e04fc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6453,6 +6453,16 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct b
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
 
+		if (rdonly_untrusted && !env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+			verbose(env, "%s access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN\n",
+				reg_type_str(env, reg->type));
+			bpf_diag_policy(
+				env, insn_idx, "read from untrusted read-only memory",
+				"the access requires CAP_PERFMON",
+				"Load the program with CAP_PERFMON, or avoid dereferencing untrusted pointers.");
+			return -EPERM;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Accesses to untrusted PTR_TO_MEM are done through probe
 		 * instructions, hence no need to check bounds in that case.
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10 14:21 [PATCH bpf 1/4] bpf: Add KF_PERFMON kfunc flag Daniel Borkmann
2026-09-10 14:21 ` [PATCH bpf 2/4] bpf: Require CAP_PERFMON for kfuncs reading memory Daniel Borkmann
2026-09-10 15:10   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-10 15:41   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-10 15:53     ` Daniel Borkmann
2026-09-10 14:21 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2026-09-10 15:42   ` [PATCH bpf 3/4] bpf: Require CAP_PERFMON for untrusted read-only memory reads Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-10 14:21 ` [PATCH bpf 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for the KF_PERFMON gates Daniel Borkmann
2026-09-10 15:03 ` [PATCH bpf 1/4] bpf: Add KF_PERFMON kfunc flag Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-10 15:14   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-10 15:21     ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-09-10 15:10 ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260910142107.40582-3-daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=info@starlabs.sg \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox