From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj2-f10.google.com (mail-pj2-f10.google.com [74.125.227.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 740F7757EA for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 02:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.138 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789095222; cv=none; b=DdBWQfyUaIz2b+G2ok0/i3BSn1cR3qRbq/9y1xhfHkXlC2vbM5EDY+9iMbgS1NKGMHAzIGJts2eqhVZYCkXURUyfSq7skgHZeJb4Nsxkb/V9OEsNokXZagj74c4elAwwwO0eAcpsetPWEVuWg2ydBV+7ki6fW33X5D0f0PkK+/g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789095222; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ld2oAqB68flkpHZQaG92juZtmDKKXFFBtSQZtjgekFk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=EtNVzFVzLit9jcSeIljAWlN5Y4JoyjumR4c7Ex2DvLstULBOqzD5JmwBY/RqvoIy1XPLAy00pXiCQ0VXfdpJgE71Kok9AXrMHF4c8cH4JwwEOvMimDfwV1NPgIsovETu1U8qZViGS1sM6wu8Lf10uLfkbxBPRqWBYx08dJvlCTA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=bFzfotLu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.138 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bFzfotLu" Received: by mail-pj2-f10.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-39d70d669a3so433462a91.0 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:53:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1789095221; x=1789700021; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=Uh65NaaDOEhx5sjTjKDziaPfjpdeniEP5x8ib42IItU=; b=bFzfotLuUpzCLdomN4KR/n+xwlN/8i2eOJYaD9ms2NIDxplIUu6VuJ8JSiMEj81umP w+jxFp5/qgZ5Tnix4ufW0uF/ehetEC3/slWl7X9Wu5HO9DzoAoe3RIlI4jHmCuYYcavl njI0/6xXp5RQGvc1hkmkq1pGRtxCdhsxAGIlkCLVjdcaWLoh4I942Ef2+wP/KyCrDkNA JbDay0C1oHcX+2OdhiVmebzIQCt09KOLbZhL685c0cCgY/PFEDu/JEZEYB2aGoVnvYYe xVm4/9JrnLD/cLDSi+Vr6JrM62RVf97kNq7eBrRy2WMk+kORww/gdpqaM7v3NSX/k3zr gSLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1789095221; x=1789700021; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=Uh65NaaDOEhx5sjTjKDziaPfjpdeniEP5x8ib42IItU=; b=cfprW8l3BHW3S3CccJsBeVdD47y0rU3TD2eoK2j4xa7qrTMCM+e3cAmRV0GxMiYDPk O2/PyJcKIVfUGaPvBGDgKqADZH56HZ1xdk+fzsQC+lhyMygsST81LwekmvaXS8QpYXTO tbo3c1eBGrjn2a+dpTNZX9aSFOwpwarAOSnRUeNq8V93FyM8NwechLbm4CEYkFdwxqbv CaiP9v1ciEAMulPoyyfduLXWsqYyQ7t+tB6b5sI5I0tGVKa7J6WVIBlkz+1Kca2qT9SW jMTHFspA2/dYWFeQ5gXVjYsn+gNsc29gVGZpJ2dxYaxKn4GiGVoZ0/Tp56CyLoy6y6sj ve4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++k8HlESVO8H44vUvLxoJdBcc2DFcwszaOYM+QW3C9rWAwb/irjA NBvVObBQH1TXlbJe1kFOuKtIIVCgt/Kg5iT79L3rcZ12oZE9MbRV30ZC X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou1bBtRTuXaJdFGhyjhPD4r76tIrG7a+Vg13rU1UBvoSvj1Xh5/mVg3Fidr+XOx 9e9DErG+wOMBgaP0VRTFCJRbMh00CPd0tYo0nvK4T/RNbNFmqcc+opTIq0SNeMW9RDIRwlcYdBd PpJjsXsX/w5AyelerAAgCe/YnVhiWpOcJgUVr2CDnw0HX4CvhyietuHYl+mw8udB8f8lR8ol25t HxrEVuhDLgiPcoH0rIAcU59b1UR86u6113bgzcVwMoNPhdBkBuCv3vZt7oOJdWz4Y45I6uDdGCK jDaGA+NhQ1cU/yxmG6TWClXgdKiW+axCkRZn4wUCB+KLLJG3A6yobr/xZUu0y7uy/Mu3T/WC9qq pz8vx7NVmsJtDycumdf98luupgKyvam2eOxI2pzHHT/0B8LQUVoYWIGEYS81l2jC/ieQ9RPiydB wyv7CuQyncIUO7eTcb6/lhcvmnOw+Lu56zTn1e7qANjZSLzWAwHajM0oPhBmz7NLR4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:5887:b0:396:61f1:da5c with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-39d9bbea9e6mr3118219a91.4.1789095220718; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.5.7 ([69.5.53.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-39d95994375sm2308858a91.17.2026.09.10.19.53.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:53:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Tianyi Chen To: kernel-ci@meta.com Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bpf-next,v3,1/2] bpftool: Accept symbolic map creation flags Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:53:35 +0800 Message-ID: <20260911025335.191682-1-diannaaav@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 In-Reply-To: <178875781913.42294.7695925924255845754.07-ci-empty-patch-report@tychen.cc> References: <178875781913.42294.7695925924255845754.07-ci-empty-patch-report@tychen.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Kernel CI team, Following up on the empty-patch reports: the affected PRs expired, and I have now rebased and resubmitted the six pending topics with the remaining review corrections. These are the current versions: - cpumask v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260911025029.190453-1-diannaaav@gmail.com - batch-key validators v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260911025036.190487-1-diannaaav@gmail.com - symbolic map flags v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260911025044.190540-1-diannaaav@gmail.com - recursive dump v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260911025100.190706-1-diannaaav@gmail.com - ring buffer event_pipe v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260911025114.190899-1-diannaaav@gmail.com - batched dump v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260911025130.191011-1-diannaaav@gmail.com All ten patches apply cleanly to their current bpf or bpf-next base. The 69 bpftool and 36 cpumask subtests passed in an x86-64 KVM guest running the rebuilt bpf/master kernel (7.3.0-rc2); test_maps also passed, with no skips in these runs. This was focused validation, not the full BPF suite. The emails were generated by git format-patch and sent using git send-email, with a new thread for each version. The BPF test changes are unchanged apart from rebasing; their previous "Patch is empty" reports did not identify conflicting hunks. Please use these versions for subsequent CI runs. If the empty-patch failure recurs, please check the mailbox download/access path described in my earlier report before treating it as a source conflict. I still cannot inspect the daemon's downloaded payload directly. Thanks, Tianyi