BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/15] bpf: Read a kfunc's __sz argument only when it is in a register
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:52:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912195201.982215-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912195156.980886-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Commit e0b7b91c72db ("bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls")
supported stack arguments for kfunc's. In bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(),
the size of a ptr + __sz pair is read from const_reg_vals[] at index
'BPF_REG_1 + arg + 1'. Past the fifth argument that index leaves the
argument registers and reaches 6 through 9, which are the callee saved
registers R6 through R9. The verifier does record constants for those,
so a __sz argument passed on the stack can take the value of an
unrelated register as its size.

Fix it by guard size_reg which has to be less than or equal to
MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS.

Fixes: e0b7b91c72db ("bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 617a277c3558..0c6a404167ca 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13641,13 +13641,14 @@ s64 bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/* ptr + __sz/__szk pair: size is in the next register */
+	/* ptr + __sz/__szk pair: the size follows the pointer */
 	if (arg + 1 < nargs &&
 	    (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg + 1], "__sz") ||
 	     btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg + 1], "__szk"))) {
 		int size_reg = BPF_REG_1 + arg + 1;
 
-		if (aux->const_reg_mask & BIT(size_reg)) {
+		if (size_reg <= MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS &&
+		    (aux->const_reg_mask & BIT(size_reg))) {
 			size = (s64)aux->const_reg_vals[size_reg];
 			goto out;
 		}
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-12 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-12 19:51 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/15] bpf: Support by-value struct and __int128 arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-09-12 20:06   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/15] bpf: Read a kfunc's __sz argument only when it is in a register sashiko-bot
2026-09-13  2:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/15] selftests/bpf: Add a test for an __int128 by-value argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/15] bpf: Rename bpf_subprog_info::arg_cnt to arg_slot_cnt Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/15] bpf: Index global function arguments by argument slot Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/15] bpf: Support by-value struct arguments up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/15] bpf: Support __int128 as a by-value function argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/15] bpf: Rename bpf_call_summary::num_params to arg_slot_cnt Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/15] bpf: Recognize by-value struct and __int128 kfunc arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/15] bpf: Prepare kfunc arguments for the JIT from an ABI description Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 20:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/15] bpf, x86: Move kfunc arguments into the x86-64 calling convention Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/15] bpf, arm64: Place trampoline arguments by the arm64 " Yonghong Song
2026-09-13  2:47   ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/15] bpf, arm64: Move kfunc arguments into " Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/15] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for by-value arguments up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/15] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm tests for by-value arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-12 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for by-value kfunc arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-13  4:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/15] bpf: Support by-value struct and __int128 arguments patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260912195201.982215-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox