From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Josef Bacik" <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 02/13] rcu-tasks: Add a Tasks RCU implementation for reader-marked trampolines
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:10:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918151031.2E0941F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918-b4-rcu-tasks-preempt-qs-v4-2-63f0e9d69661@toxicpanda.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] rcu-tasks: NULL pointer dereference in rcu_tasks_irq_resched_enter() during early boot
--
commit ea4914f1671c6b6ff32f3cbc1cd74fa6dd51744d
Author: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
rcu-tasks: Add a Tasks RCU implementation for reader-marked trampolines
This commit introduces a Tasks RCU implementation for architectures that
make their trampolines Tasks Trace RCU readers. It hooks into the generic
irq entry code to track preemptions. The tracking utilizes a per-CPU list
for tasks preempted during irq exit.
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> index e4acd50bd81a1..94318519998c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -141,8 +142,13 @@ void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(struct pt_regs *regs)
> rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt();
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
> - if (need_resched() && arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched())
> + if (need_resched() && arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched()) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS))
> + rcu_tasks_irq_resched_enter(instruction_pointer(regs));
> preempt_schedule_irq();
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRAMPOLINE_READERS))
> + rcu_tasks_irq_resched_exit();
> + }
> }
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index 627295396cd91..f03be742be48c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
[ ... ]
> +void rcu_tasks_irq_resched_enter(unsigned long ip)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *t = current;
> + struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_tasks.rtpcpu);
> +
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> + WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_irq_ip, ip);
> + t->rcu_tasks_exit_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rtpcp);
> + list_add(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list, &rtpcp->rtp_exit_list);
[Severity: Critical]
Could this cause a null pointer dereference regression during early boot?
When the trampoline reader feature is selected,
raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched() hooks into the generic irq exit path to
call rcu_tasks_irq_resched_enter(). During early boot, interrupts are
enabled via local_irq_enable() in start_kernel(), meaning preemptions can
begin occurring.
However, the per-cpu rtp_exit_list list head cannot be statically
initialized and is dynamically initialized via cblist_init_generic() from
a core_initcall. Since core_initcalls are executed much later by the
kernel_init thread, any preemption before that phase will attempt to
list_add() to a zero-initialized (null) rtp_exit_list.
Would this lead to a kernel panic when the list macros dereference the
uninitialized head pointer?
> + raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rtpcp);
> +
> + if (unlikely(rcu_tasks_trampoline_text(ip)))
> + rcu_tasks_tramp_hold(t);
> + else
> + rcu_tasks_tramp_release(t);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918-b4-rcu-tasks-preempt-qs-v4-0-63f0e9d69661@toxicpanda.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 14:49 [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] rcu-tasks: build Tasks RCU on Tasks Trace readers in trampolines Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/13] entry: Pass pt_regs to irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/13] rcu-tasks: Add a Tasks RCU implementation for reader-marked trampolines Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 15:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 15:48 ` Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/13] kprobes: Expose the optprobe jump window to Tasks RCU Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/13] ftrace: Mark modules hosting direct-call trampolines for " Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/13] x86/ftrace: Take a Tasks Trace reader around ftrace_caller's call-out Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/13] x86/kprobes: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the optprobe template Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/13] bpf, x86: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the trampoline around its call-outs Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 21:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/13] arm64: ftrace: Take a Tasks Trace reader around ftrace_caller's call-out Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/13] bpf, arm64: Take a Tasks Trace reader in the trampoline around its call-outs Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/13] samples: ftrace: Make the direct-call trampolines Tasks Trace readers Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/13] rcutorture: Make Tasks RCU readers Tasks Trace readers where required Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/13] rcu-tasks-trace: Assert no reader is held on return to userspace Josef Bacik
2026-09-18 14:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 13/13] x86, arm64: Build Tasks RCU on Tasks Trace readers in trampolines Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918151031.2E0941F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox