From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/11] selftests/bpf: Allow privileged preparation for capability tests
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 04:38:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921023843.411943-2-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921023843.411943-1-memxor@gmail.com>
The annotation-driven loader drops capabilities before libbpf prepares an
object. Resolving bpf_testmod kfuncs requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN to enumerate and
open module BTF, so tests without that capability fail before reaching the
verifier.
Add an opt-in __prepare_priv annotation. Call bpf_object__prepare() with the
fixture's initial capabilities, then apply __caps_unpriv before loading the
programs. This uses libbpf's explicit prepare/load boundary. In particular,
CAP_SYS_ADMIN must be dropped along with CAP_PERFMON to test uninitialized
stack checks, since CAP_SYS_ADMIN satisfies the verifier's CAP_PERFMON check.
Preparation also creates maps and loads BTF. Keep it opt-in so existing tests
continue checking those operations with reduced capabilities. The existing
pre-execution callback runs after program loading and is too late for this.
Allow tests retaining CAP_BPF to run when the unprivileged-BPF sysctl is set.
Check CPU mitigations separately: disabled or undetectable mitigations must
still skip these tests, because CAP_BPF does not restore speculative
execution checks.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 9 +++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 48 ++++++++++++++------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c | 16 +++++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h | 2 +
4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
index eb88d9ce6c34..2ced1d751ace 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
#define QUOTE(str) #str
#define EXPAND_QUOTE(str) QUOTE(str)
-/* This set of attributes controls behavior of the
+/*
+ * This set of attributes controls behavior of the
* test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests().
*
* The test_loader sequentially loads each program in a skeleton.
@@ -131,6 +132,11 @@
* Several __arch_* annotations could be specified at once.
* When test case is not run on current arch it is marked as skipped.
* __caps_unpriv Specify the capabilities that should be set when running the test.
+ * __prepare_priv In unprivileged mode, prepare the object with the fixture's
+ * initial capabilities before dropping them for program loading.
+ * Preparation includes map creation and BTF/kfunc resolution;
+ * these operations are not tested at the reduced capabilities.
+ * Program loading uses the normal __caps_unpriv selection.
*
* __linear_size Specify the size of the linear area of non-linear skbs, or
* 0 for linear skbs.
@@ -166,6 +172,7 @@
#define __arch_s390x __arch("s390x")
#define __arch_loongarch __arch("LOONGARCH")
#define __caps_unpriv(caps) __test_tag("test_caps_unpriv=" EXPAND_QUOTE(caps))
+#define __prepare_priv __test_tag("test_prepare_priv")
#define __load_if_JITed() __test_tag("load_mode=jited")
#define __load_if_no_JITed() __test_tag("load_mode=no_jited")
#define __stderr(msg) __test_tag("test_expect_stderr=" msg)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index 28724de06322..a6e3fcc1079c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static inline const char *str_has_pfx(const char *str, const char *pfx)
#endif
static int sysctl_unpriv_disabled = -1;
+static int unpriv_mitigations_disabled = -1;
enum mode {
PRIV = 1,
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ struct test_spec {
int load_mask;
int linear_sz;
const char *skip_reason;
+ bool prepare_priv;
bool auxiliary;
bool valid;
};
@@ -606,6 +608,8 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
if (err)
goto cleanup;
spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
+ } else if (strcmp(s, "test_prepare_priv") == 0) {
+ spec->prepare_priv = true;
} else if ((val = str_has_pfx(s, "load_mode="))) {
if (strcmp(val, "jited") == 0) {
load_mask = JITED;
@@ -1015,10 +1019,10 @@ struct cap_state {
bool initialized;
};
-static int drop_capabilities(struct cap_state *caps)
+static int drop_capabilities(struct cap_state *caps, __u64 keep_caps)
{
const __u64 caps_to_drop = (1ULL << CAP_SYS_ADMIN | 1ULL << CAP_NET_ADMIN |
- 1ULL << CAP_PERFMON | 1ULL << CAP_BPF);
+ 1ULL << CAP_PERFMON | 1ULL << CAP_BPF) & ~keep_caps;
int err;
err = cap_disable_effective(caps_to_drop, &caps->old_caps);
@@ -1028,6 +1032,13 @@ static int drop_capabilities(struct cap_state *caps)
}
caps->initialized = true;
+ if (keep_caps) {
+ err = cap_enable_effective(keep_caps, NULL);
+ if (err) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to set capabilities: %i, %s\n", err, strerror(-err));
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -1048,8 +1059,12 @@ static int restore_capabilities(struct cap_state *caps)
static bool can_execute_unpriv(struct test_loader *tester, struct test_spec *spec)
{
if (sysctl_unpriv_disabled < 0)
- sysctl_unpriv_disabled = get_unpriv_disabled() ? 1 : 0;
- if (sysctl_unpriv_disabled)
+ sysctl_unpriv_disabled = get_unpriv_sysctl_disabled();
+ if (sysctl_unpriv_disabled && !(spec->unpriv.caps & (1ULL << CAP_BPF)))
+ return false;
+ if (unpriv_mitigations_disabled < 0)
+ unpriv_mitigations_disabled = get_unpriv_mitigations_disabled();
+ if (unpriv_mitigations_disabled)
return false;
if ((spec->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT) && !EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
return false;
@@ -1351,17 +1366,8 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
test__end_subtest();
return;
}
- if (drop_capabilities(&caps)) {
- test__end_subtest();
- return;
- }
- if (subspec->caps) {
- err = cap_enable_effective(subspec->caps, NULL);
- if (err) {
- PRINT_FAIL("failed to set capabilities: %i, %s\n", err, strerror(-err));
- goto subtest_cleanup;
- }
- }
+ if (!spec->prepare_priv && drop_capabilities(&caps, subspec->caps))
+ goto subtest_cleanup;
}
/* Implicitly reset to NULL if next test case doesn't specify.
@@ -1414,6 +1420,18 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
bpf_object__for_each_map(map, tobj)
bpf_map__set_autocreate(map, !unpriv || is_unpriv_capable_map(map));
+ if (unpriv && spec->prepare_priv) {
+ /*
+ * Module BTF lookup needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN. Allow tests to prepare
+ * their objects first, then verify programs with the requested caps.
+ */
+ err = bpf_object__prepare(tobj);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "obj_prepare"))
+ goto tobj_cleanup;
+ if (drop_capabilities(&caps, subspec->caps))
+ goto tobj_cleanup;
+ }
+
err = bpf_object__load(tobj);
if (subspec->expect_failure) {
if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected_load_success")) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c
index 2c8c5edb8751..c8dd5d848584 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c
@@ -111,9 +111,8 @@ static int get_mitigations_off(void)
return !enabled_in_config;
}
-bool get_unpriv_disabled(void)
+bool get_unpriv_sysctl_disabled(void)
{
- int mitigations_off;
bool disabled;
char buf[2];
FILE *fd;
@@ -127,8 +126,12 @@ bool get_unpriv_disabled(void)
disabled = true;
}
- if (disabled)
- return true;
+ return disabled;
+}
+
+bool get_unpriv_mitigations_disabled(void)
+{
+ int mitigations_off;
/*
* Some unpriv tests rely on spectre mitigations being on.
@@ -144,6 +147,11 @@ bool get_unpriv_disabled(void)
return mitigations_off;
}
+bool get_unpriv_disabled(void)
+{
+ return get_unpriv_sysctl_disabled() || get_unpriv_mitigations_disabled();
+}
+
bool get_kasan_jit_enabled(void)
{
return config_contains("CONFIG_BPF_JIT_KASAN=y") == 1;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h
index a7ceb51577cd..c24d53e14f3a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h
@@ -5,5 +5,7 @@
#define UNPRIV_SYSCTL "kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled"
bool get_unpriv_disabled(void);
+bool get_unpriv_sysctl_disabled(void);
+bool get_unpriv_mitigations_disabled(void);
bool get_kasan_jit_enabled(void);
bool get_kasan_multi_shot_enabled(void);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 2:38 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/11] Fix generic __uninit kfunc output buffers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 2:38 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/11] bpf: Record raw memory arguments during argument checking Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/11] bpf: Check __uninit kfunc output buffers as write-only Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 3:54 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/11] bpf: Fix generic __uninit kfunc output buffers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/11] selftests/bpf: Cover generic __uninit output initialization Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/11] bpf: Support multiple __uninit kfunc output arguments Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/11] selftests/bpf: Cover __uninit kfunc output argument slots Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/11] bpf: Preserve stack initialization for generic output buffers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 3:54 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/11] selftests/bpf: Cover generic output stack initialization Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 3:54 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/11] bpf: Check read access for helper input/output buffers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 2:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/11] selftests/bpf: Cover helper memory access permissions Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-21 3:54 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/11] Fix generic __uninit kfunc output buffers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921023843.411943-2-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox