From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB1D1577E3B; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790097788; cv=none; b=CK/2XvQzYVDybkLduKW6lHwwTWkkoPAPPTQEVpHzPbm95F/rKsnjZ0Dee6VsYsC9/s+/81P33BMpWyRRC6IbwHTIsoQFP9RnoxgLt1Ou5hQDsKAgVH2VK6rA1vdVtytzztgmiwG1fkrqYYnnz95cok6nxSj2eGnnIhS7kBgNi84= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790097788; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FVOP20CywOlOscX6m2SDY5nX87BWQA9RNgIT4wRKV8U=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=iypqPsrWN1Oq2NeGED/fMXA6083Tl8r6+KgTNq+3QgijllrfqcY1N+alvlbCzScBY1RVxo42BqcIsIrczp5xyeF7oz/f3Nt8wRBIoA7cufuKbjj2WoZSAeJujQVFYVsMdXkiZpnXfHXbwZoL8AEg8GDLQOBwKBS11Dh/WeooXFY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NvEZ3ZR1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NvEZ3ZR1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 270351F000FF; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:23:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790097784; bh=FVOP20CywOlOscX6m2SDY5nX87BWQA9RNgIT4wRKV8U=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=NvEZ3ZR1W88GHhCGwSiECzXDi7Bo1GfHgA6kyq1vMkQsSgOn0UMpebsSBtStaSHdY 050AnFfezmAfLnrgn5yZhQa5nGF2/mYNuvH47l0iouQReOrMRlHUSwaZEjeCDOEdOn tRc0ETValrxXhT/wjt/LphBS8+HXyEqtgho/3Z44YynYa5sMLcL+Tc4m5aFuNF1tUp qVdj0z4udi773I/9DYS4rxQBG1z/AllvIGDP5wRY+Qk0hnq7Xxm4g90n3bKUkuB3XN +ws3BrBo4o/LsRsi7qfZqOOawwDMyrXgw1St9MNGQ2x8pGTVWlciJUmdw6mlLdWAs4 MGuihCb/WmFDA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/i915: use hw_pte_t for PTE range callbacks Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Muhammad Usama Anjum" Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260922-pte0-v3-8-5670b8cb9059@arm.com> References: <20260922-pte0-v3-0-5670b8cb9059@arm.com> <20260922-pte0-v3-8-5670b8cb9059@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:23:03 +0000 Message-Id: <20260922172304.270351F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > apply_to_page_range() now passes PTE table storage to its callback as > hw_pte_t *. Update the i915 remap and selftest callbacks to match the new > type. >=20 > Continue to use ptep_get() for software PTE values and set_pte_at() for > updates. > The type remains an alias of pte_t on x86 until that architecture opts in. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922-pte0-v3-0-= 5670b8cb9059@arm.com?part=3D8