From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bill Wendling" <morbo@google.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: bpf: add __counted_by_ptr attribute to device_data
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 07:12:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923071246.161FE1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923065612.2707049-1-morbo@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] hid-bpf: kernel panic in FORTIFY memcpy due to lockless allocation race
--
commit 146c59142d1d9271032a5ce18e55e70b22ecb2ec
Author: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
HID: bpf: add __counted_by_ptr attribute to device_data
This commit adds the __counted_by_ptr attribute to the device_data field in
struct hid_bpf, pointing to allocated_data. It also swaps the assignment order
of size and data in __hid_bpf_allocate_data() to ensure the buffer size is set
before the pointer.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c b/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c
> index d46779b63660b..fb302d0b97970 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c
> @@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ static int __hid_bpf_allocate_data(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 **data, u32 *size
> if (!alloc_data)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - *data = alloc_data;
> *size = alloc_size;
> + *data = alloc_data;
[Severity: High]
Does this lockless assignment guarantee that the reader will observe
allocated_data being set before device_data?
Without memory barriers like smp_store_release(), the CPU can reorder these
stores. Concurrently, an incoming HID report triggering
dispatch_hid_bpf_device_event() can read these fields locklessly without
smp_load_acquire().
If the reader observes device_data != NULL but allocated_data == 0, can it
lead to a fatal FORTIFY bounds check panic here:
drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.c:dispatch_hid_bpf_device_event() {
...
memcpy(ctx_kern.data, data, *size);
...
}
Because the __counted_by_ptr annotation statically ties the bounds of
device_data to allocated_data, if allocated_data is 0, ctx_kern.data would
inherit a 0 bound. Calling memcpy() to write into it would then trigger a
kernel panic.
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/hid_bpf.h b/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
> index 19fffa4574a47..f45fb9cccece8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hid_bpf.h
> @@ -185,10 +185,12 @@ struct hid_bpf_ops {
>
> /* stored in each device */
> struct hid_bpf {
> - u8 *device_data; /* allocated when a bpf program of type
> - * SEC(f.../hid_bpf_device_event) has been attached
> - * to this HID device
> - */
> + /*
> + * allocated when a bpf program of type
> + * SEC(f.../hid_bpf_device_event) has been attached
> + * to this HID device
> + */
> + u8 *device_data __counted_by_ptr(allocated_data);
> u32 allocated_data;
> bool destroyed; /* prevents the assignment of any progs */
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923065612.2707049-1-morbo@google.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 6:31 [PATCH] HID: bpf: add __counted_by_ptr attribute to device_data Bill Wendling
2026-09-23 6:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 6:56 ` Bill Wendling
2026-09-23 6:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Bill Wendling
2026-09-23 7:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923071246.161FE1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox