BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/18] bpf: Grow the verifier id scratch on demand
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:11:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923191139.2816206-9-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923191139.2816206-1-memxor@gmail.com>

The id map used to compare the ids of two states, which also serves as
the id stack of release_reference() and as the id set of
bpf_clear_singular_ids(), is a fixed array embedded in struct
bpf_verifier_env and sized for the most registers and stack slots a
state can possibly hold: 1312 entries, 10 KiB, for 512-byte frames, and
four times that once frames may reach 2 KiB, which pushes the env
allocation from 64 KiB to 128 KiB for every program verified. States
compare a few dozen ids in practice.

Turn the map and the set into arrays grown on demand, starting at 64
entries and doubling, and free them with the env. A map that cannot
grow treats the states as different, an id set that cannot grow keeps
the id, and the id stack reports -ENOMEM, so an allocation failure is
never unsafe. This removes the last structure whose size scaled with
the stack bound and shrinks the env by 10 KiB.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 29 ++++++++++++++----------
 kernel/bpf/states.c          | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 20 +++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 0f348ce81fe2..d8cafd3d74aa 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -408,10 +408,7 @@ struct bpf_jmp_history_entry {
 static_assert(MAX_CALL_FRAMES <= (1 << 4));
 static_assert(MAX_BPF_STACK_SLOTS <= (1 << 12));
 
-/* Maximum number of bpf_reg_state objects that can exist at once */
 #define MAX_STACK_ARG_SLOTS (MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS - MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS)
-#define BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE ((MAX_BPF_REG + MAX_BPF_STACK_SLOTS + MAX_STACK_ARG_SLOTS) * \
-			 MAX_CALL_FRAMES)
 struct bpf_verifier_state {
 	/* call stack tracking */
 	struct bpf_func_state *frame[MAX_CALL_FRAMES];
@@ -842,18 +839,27 @@ struct bpf_id_pair {
 	u32 cur;
 };
 
+/*
+ * Scratch map from the ids of one verifier state to those of another, also
+ * used as a stack of ids. Grown on demand by bpf_id_scratch_reserve().
+ */
 struct bpf_idmap {
 	u32 tmp_id_gen;
 	u32 cnt;
-	struct bpf_id_pair map[BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE];
+	u32 cap;
+	struct bpf_id_pair *map;
 };
 
+struct bpf_idset_entry {
+	u32 id;
+	u32 cnt;
+};
+
+/* Scratch set of ids with a use count each, grown on demand */
 struct bpf_idset {
 	u32 num_ids;
-	struct {
-		u32 id;
-		u32 cnt;
-	} entries[BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE];
+	u32 cap;
+	struct bpf_idset_entry *entries;
 };
 
 /* see verifier.c:compute_scc_callchain() */
@@ -948,10 +954,8 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
 	struct bpf_subprog_info subprog_info[BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS + 2]; /* max + 2 for the fake and exception subprogs */
 	/* subprog indices sorted in topological order: leaves first, callers last */
 	int subprog_topo_order[BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS + 2];
-	union {
-		struct bpf_idmap idmap_scratch;
-		struct bpf_idset idset_scratch;
-	};
+	struct bpf_idmap idmap_scratch;
+	struct bpf_idset idset_scratch;
 	struct {
 		int *insn_state;
 		int *insn_stack;
@@ -1209,6 +1213,7 @@ int bpf_copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state,
 struct list_head *bpf_explored_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx);
 void bpf_free_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, bool free_self);
 void bpf_free_backedges(struct bpf_scc_visit *visit);
+bool bpf_id_scratch_reserve(void **arr, u32 *cap, u32 cnt, size_t elem_size);
 int bpf_push_jmp_history(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *cur,
 			 int insn_flags, int spi, int frame, const u16 *linked_regs,
 			 u8 linked_regs_cnt);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/states.c b/kernel/bpf/states.c
index e84f37d724d5..5078e4832c6e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/states.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/states.c
@@ -335,21 +335,18 @@ static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cur_id, struct bpf_idmap *idmap)
 			return false;
 	}
 
-	/* Reached the end of known mappings; haven't seen this id before */
-	if (idmap->cnt < BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE) {
-		map[idmap->cnt].old = old_id;
-		map[idmap->cnt].cur = cur_id;
-		idmap->cnt++;
-		return true;
-	}
-
 	/*
-	 * idmap slots are bounded by the number of registers and stack slots.
-	 * Since referenced dynptrs acquire intermediate references that do
-	 * not live in either, so the map can be exhausted. Since it is unlikely,
-	 * fail the verification by treating the states as not equivalent.
+	 * Reached the end of known mappings; haven't seen this id before. If
+	 * the map cannot grow, treat the states as not equivalent, which only
+	 * costs pruning.
 	 */
-	return false;
+	if (!bpf_id_scratch_reserve((void **)&idmap->map, &idmap->cap, idmap->cnt, sizeof(*map)))
+		return false;
+	map = idmap->map;
+	map[idmap->cnt].old = old_id;
+	map[idmap->cnt].cur = cur_id;
+	idmap->cnt++;
+	return true;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -965,6 +962,27 @@ static bool func_states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_stat
 	return true;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Make room for one more entry in an id scratch array, doubling it as needed.
+ * Returns false if it could not grow; callers then treat the id as unknown
+ * or the states as different, which is always safe.
+ */
+bool bpf_id_scratch_reserve(void **arr, u32 *cap, u32 cnt, size_t elem_size)
+{
+	u32 new_cap;
+	void *p;
+
+	if (cnt < *cap)
+		return true;
+	new_cap = *cap ? *cap * 2 : 64;
+	p = krealloc_array(*arr, new_cap, elem_size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	if (!p)
+		return false;
+	*arr = p;
+	*cap = new_cap;
+	return true;
+}
+
 static void reset_idmap_scratch(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
 	struct bpf_idmap *idmap = &env->idmap_scratch;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d8f43f3a8991..8641f1a8d017 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -10136,8 +10136,9 @@ static int idstack_push(struct bpf_idmap *idmap, u32 id)
 		if (idmap->map[i].old == id)
 			return 0;
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idmap->cnt >= BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE))
-		return -EFAULT;
+	if (!bpf_id_scratch_reserve((void **)&idmap->map, &idmap->cap, idmap->cnt,
+				    sizeof(*idmap->map)))
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	idmap->map[idmap->cnt++].old = id;
 	return 0;
@@ -18438,12 +18439,13 @@ static void idset_cnt_inc(struct bpf_idset *idset, u32 id)
 			return;
 		}
 	}
-	/* New id */
-	if (idset->num_ids < BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE) {
-		idset->entries[idset->num_ids].id = id;
-		idset->entries[idset->num_ids].cnt = 1;
-		idset->num_ids++;
-	}
+	/* New id; one that cannot be recorded counts as shared and is kept */
+	if (!bpf_id_scratch_reserve((void **)&idset->entries, &idset->cap, idset->num_ids,
+				    sizeof(*idset->entries)))
+		return;
+	idset->entries[idset->num_ids].id = id;
+	idset->entries[idset->num_ids].cnt = 1;
+	idset->num_ids++;
 }
 
 /* Find id in idset and return its count, or 0 if not found */
@@ -22003,6 +22005,8 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,
 	kvfree(env->scc_info);
 	kvfree(env->succ);
 	kvfree(env->gotox_tmp_buf);
+	kfree(env->idmap_scratch.map);
+	kfree(env->idset_scratch.entries);
 	bpf_diag_free(env);
 	kvfree(env);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 19:11 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/18] Raise BPF program stack size to 2KiB Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/18] bpf: Add accessors for verifier stack slots Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:57   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 20:04     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/18] bpf: Widen the stack slot index in the jump history Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/18] bpf: Store linked registers in the jump history as an array Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/18] bpf: Track backtracking stack slots with bitmaps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/18] bpf: Track scratched stack slots with a bitmap Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/18] bpf: Treat unknown-size stack reads as reaching the frame top Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/18] bpf: Size liveness stack masks by the stack each frame uses Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-23 19:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/18] bpf: Grow the verifier id scratch on demand sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 19:29     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/18] selftests/bpf: Cover the tail call caller stack depth limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/18] selftests/bpf: Check that narrow stack stores define no slot Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/18] selftests/bpf: Check liveness merge of masks with different widths Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 19:29     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/18] bpf: Size the per-frame verifier structures for a 2 KiB stack Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 20:12   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 20:27     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 22:55   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/18] bpf: Bound program stack use by a per-program limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/18] selftests/bpf: Add load conditions on the program stack limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 20:12   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 20:27     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/18] selftests/bpf: Give the 512-byte stack boundary tests a 2 KiB twin Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/18] bpf, x86: Allow programs 2 KiB of stack Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 20:12   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 20:28     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/18] bpf, arm64: " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 19:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 18/18] selftests/bpf: Test the 2 KiB stack budget Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-23 20:12   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 20:28     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923191139.2816206-9-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kkd@meta.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox