BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: "Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
	"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
	"Tenzin Ukyab" <ukyab@berkeley.edu>,
	"Clément Léger" <cleger@meta.com>,
	"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
	"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: mptcp: Don't support BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB_FLAG.
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:35:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923213719.224838-7-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923213719.224838-1-kuniyu@google.com>

The next patch exposes a new kfunc calling __tcp_set_rcvlowat()
to bpf_tcp_ops.

MPTCP has its own sock->ops->set_rcvlowat() / mptcp_set_rcvlowat(),
so we should not allow calling __tcp_set_rcvlowat() on MPTCP
subflows.

Let's disable BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB_FLAG for MPTCP for now.

If needed in the future, bpf_tcp_ops_set_rcvlowat() could be
extended to properly support MPTCP.

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
 include/net/tcp.h      | 15 +++++++++++++++
 net/core/filter.c      | 10 ++++++----
 net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c |  5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 07426e8641b7..d3cf655da9ec 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -2932,6 +2932,16 @@ static inline int tcp_call_bpf_3arg(struct sock *sk, int op, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
 	return tcp_call_bpf(sk, op, 3, args);
 }
 
+static inline int tcp_set_sock_ops_cb_flags(struct sock *sk, int val)
+{
+	if (sk_is_mptcp(sk) &&
+	    (val & BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB_FLAG))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	tcp_sk(sk)->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags = val;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void tcp_clear_sock_ops_cb_flags(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	tcp_sk(sk)->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags = 0;
@@ -2954,6 +2964,11 @@ static inline int tcp_call_bpf_3arg(struct sock *sk, int op, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
 	return -EPERM;
 }
 
+static inline int tcp_set_sock_ops_cb_flags(struct sock *sk, int val)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static inline void tcp_clear_sock_ops_cb_flags(struct sock *sk)
 {
 }
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 5feb99884682..f29c061bb066 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5588,8 +5588,7 @@ static int bpf_sol_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
 	case TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS:
 		if (val & ~(BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		tp->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags = val;
-		break;
+		return tcp_set_sock_ops_cb_flags(sk, val);
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -6178,8 +6177,9 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_ops_getsockopt_proto = {
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 	   int, argval)
 {
-	struct sock *sk = bpf_sock->sk;
 	int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS;
+	struct sock *sk = bpf_sock->sk;
+	int err;
 
 	if (!is_locked_tcp_sock_ops(bpf_sock))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -6187,7 +6187,9 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) || !sk_fullsock(sk))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	tcp_sk(sk)->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags = val;
+	err = tcp_set_sock_ops_cb_flags(sk, val);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	return argval & (~BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS);
 }
diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
index 4b48711d92a2..b0cade34cce6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
@@ -223,8 +223,11 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_tcp_ops_get_retval_proto = {
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_tcp_ops_cb_flags_set, struct sock *, sk, int, argval)
 {
 	int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS;
+	int err;
 
-	tcp_sk(sk)->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags = val;
+	err = tcp_set_sock_ops_cb_flags(sk, val);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	return argval & ~BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS;
 }
-- 
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 21:35 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add bpf_tcp_ops hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 21:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/8] bpf: tcp: Convert deny-list for bpf_{get,set}sockopt() to allow-list Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 22:04   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-09-23 22:31   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-24 15:53   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-23 21:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/8] selftest: bpf: Use BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS + 1 for bad_cb_test_rv Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 22:11   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-09-23 21:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: tcp: Introduce bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 21:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 22:42   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-09-25  0:04   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-25  0:39     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-25  1:41       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-25 17:33         ` Amery Hung
2026-09-27  0:18           ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-30 19:56             ` Amery Hung
2026-09-30 21:03               ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 21:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/8] bpf: tcp: Support bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() for bpf_tcp_ops Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 22:31   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 21:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/8] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-24  3:39   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-09-23 21:35 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-09-24  3:48   ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: mptcp: Don't support BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB_FLAG Emil Tsalapatis
2026-09-24  4:10     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 21:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/8] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-23 22:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 22:21     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-24  0:30   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-09-23 21:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 8/8] selftest: bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923213719.224838-7-kuniyu@google.com \
    --to=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cleger@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=ukyab@berkeley.edu \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox