From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1] selftests/bpf: Refactor cb_refs selftests
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 16:07:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923230717.3156345-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> (raw)
cb_refs matches verifier messages such as "Unreleased reference id=4
alloc_insn=3". The ID is allocated from env->id_gen, so it changes
whenever the verifier assigns another ID earlier in the program.
In the bpf tree commit 71919742c83c ("bpf: Assign lock identity to
callback map values") gives each callback map value an ID, and the
nested_cb expectation was changed to id=5.
In the bpf-next tree, commit 5dc1549afac9 ("bpf: Consolidate release
argument validation") changed leak_prog to expect id=4 from the same
leak check.
The trees are merged in linux-next, and there leak_prog reports id=5
and the test fails [1]:
Expected: Unreleased reference id=4 alloc_insn=3
...
Unreleased reference id=5 alloc_insn=33
The ID is incidental. The test checks that the verifier rejects the
leak and which acquisition leaked.
Convert the test to test_loader, register the test in
prog_tests/verifier.c and drop unnecessary prog_tests/cb_refs.c file.
[1] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/35923662147/job/107398076527
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cb_refs.c | 48 -------------------
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 3 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c | 5 ++
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cb_refs.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cb_refs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cb_refs.c
deleted file mode 100644
index c32c6dab49bc..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cb_refs.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-#include "bpf/libbpf.h"
-#include <test_progs.h>
-#include <network_helpers.h>
-
-#include "cb_refs.skel.h"
-
-static char log_buf[1024 * 1024];
-
-struct {
- const char *prog_name;
- const char *err_msg;
-} cb_refs_tests[] = {
- { "underflow_prog", "R1 type=scalar expected=ptr_, trusted_ptr_, rcu_ptr_" },
- { "leak_prog", "Unreleased reference id=4 alloc_insn=3" }, /* alloc_insn=3{2,3} */
- { "nested_cb", "Unreleased reference id=4 alloc_insn=2" }, /* alloc_insn=2{4,5} */
- { "non_cb_transfer_ref", "Unreleased reference id=4 alloc_insn=1" }, /* alloc_insn=1{1,2} */
-};
-
-void test_cb_refs(void)
-{
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts, .kernel_log_buf = log_buf,
- .kernel_log_size = sizeof(log_buf),
- .kernel_log_level = 1);
- struct bpf_program *prog;
- struct cb_refs *skel;
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cb_refs_tests); i++) {
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, run_opts,
- .data_in = &pkt_v4,
- .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
- .repeat = 1,
- );
- skel = cb_refs__open_opts(&opts);
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "cb_refs__open_and_load"))
- return;
- prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, cb_refs_tests[i].prog_name);
- bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
- if (!ASSERT_ERR(cb_refs__load(skel), "cb_refs__load"))
- bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &run_opts);
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(log_buf, cb_refs_tests[i].err_msg), "expected error message")) {
- fprintf(stderr, "Expected: %s\n", cb_refs_tests[i].err_msg);
- fprintf(stderr, "Verifier: %s\n", log_buf);
- }
- cb_refs__destroy(skel);
- }
-}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 4f1e1c1cd5ab..8b4be06bb181 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include "arena_kfunc.skel.h"
#include "arena_kfunc_jit.skel.h"
#include "cap_helpers.h"
+#include "cb_refs.skel.h"
#include "verifier_aggregate_arg.skel.h"
#include "verifier_aggregate_ret.skel.h"
#include "verifier_align.skel.h"
@@ -176,6 +177,8 @@ void test_arena_kfunc(void) { RUN_TESTS(arena_kfunc); }
void test_arena_kfunc_jit(void) { RUN_TESTS(arena_kfunc_jit); }
+void test_cb_refs(void) { RUN_TESTS(cb_refs); }
+
void test_verifier_aggregate_arg(void) { RUN_TESTS(verifier_aggregate_arg); }
void test_verifier_aggregate_ret(void) { RUN_TESTS(verifier_aggregate_ret); }
void test_verifier_align(void) { RUN(verifier_align); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c
index 5d6fc7f01ebb..d4a691db8a15 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include <vmlinux.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
struct map_value {
@@ -24,6 +25,7 @@ static __noinline int cb1(void *map, void *key, void *value, void *ctx)
}
SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("R1 type=scalar expected=ptr_, trusted_ptr_, rcu_ptr_")
int underflow_prog(void *ctx)
{
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
@@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ static __always_inline int cb2(void *map, void *key, void *value, void *ctx)
}
SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("Unreleased reference id={{[0-9]+}} alloc_insn=3") /* alloc_insn=3{0,2,3} */
int leak_prog(void *ctx)
{
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
@@ -83,6 +86,7 @@ static __always_inline int cb3(void *map, void *key, void *value, void *ctx)
}
SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("Unreleased reference id={{[0-9]+}} alloc_insn=2") /* alloc_insn=2{2,4,5} */
int nested_cb(void *ctx)
{
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
@@ -98,6 +102,7 @@ int nested_cb(void *ctx)
}
SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("Unreleased reference id={{[0-9]+}} alloc_insn=1") /* alloc_insn=1{1,2} */
int non_cb_transfer_ref(void *ctx)
{
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 23:07 Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-09-23 23:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1] selftests/bpf: Refactor cb_refs selftests Amery Hung
2026-09-24 0:26 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-09-24 1:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923230717.3156345-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox