From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andrey Grodzovsky" <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/8] libbpf: Version bpf_program__set_autoattach() ABI change
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 23:41:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923234127.EDD341F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923232939.1886328-6-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] libbpf: API/ABI pollution with internal symbol versioning aliases
--
commit d36af029b0efcdd76647414b7d862ed1b5af5ff2
Author: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
libbpf: Version bpf_program__set_autoattach() ABI change
This commit splits bpf_program__set_autoattach() via ELF symbol versioning to
change its return type from void to int. It introduces
bpf_program__set_autoattach_deprecated for the original behavior and
bpf_program__set_autoattach_v1_8_0 for the new behavior.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index faea42f758479..d172c137cc376 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -393,6 +393,12 @@ LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__autoload(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_autoload(struct bpf_program *prog, bool autoload);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__autoattach(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_autoattach(struct bpf_program *prog, bool autoattach);
> +/* this "specialization" should go away once the deprecation window for
> + * bpf_program__set_autoattach_deprecated() closes
> + */
> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_autoattach_v1_8_0(struct bpf_program *prog, bool autoattach);
> +LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(1, 8, "use int-returning bpf_program__set_autoattach() instead")
> +LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__set_autoattach_deprecated(struct bpf_program *prog, bool autoattach);
[Severity: High]
Does exposing these internal versioning aliases in the public header pollute
the public API?
Since bpf_program__set_autoattach_v1_8_0 is not in the export map, won't any
direct calls to it by users cause linker errors?
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> index 8def5474885a8..999e791d98870 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
[ ... ]
> @@ -465,6 +465,8 @@ LIBBPF_1.8.0 {
> bpf_program__clone;
> bpf_program__load;
> bpf_program__load_strategy;
> + bpf_program__set_autoattach;
> + bpf_program__set_autoattach_deprecated;
[Severity: High]
Is it intended to export bpf_program__set_autoattach_deprecated in the
LIBBPF_1.8.0 ABI node?
This seems to make it a newly added, globally-visible ABI symbol instead of
an internal symver target, which permanently pollutes the libbpf.so stable
ABI.
> bpf_program__set_load_strategy;
> btf__find_by_name_kind_own;
> btf__new_empty_opts;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923232939.1886328-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 23:29 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/8] libbpf: BPF program manual loading Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/8] libbpf: BPF program load strategy enum Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-24 0:18 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/8] libbpf: BPF programs manual loading and attaching Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-23 23:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 0:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28 1:40 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-30 15:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-09-24 23:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-09-26 16:56 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] libbpf: Support declarative manual load via SEC("!...") prefix Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-24 23:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/8] libbpf: Reject gen_loader for objects with already-manual programs Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-24 23:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-09-26 17:49 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/8] libbpf: Version bpf_program__set_autoattach() ABI change Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-23 23:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24 0:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-24 23:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-09-26 18:04 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-30 15:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/8] selftests/bpf: Cover BPF program load strategy transitions Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-24 0:18 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/8] selftests/bpf: Cover BPF program manual loading Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-24 0:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-23 23:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/8] selftests/bpf: Convert veristat to BPF_PROG_LOAD_STRATEGY_MANUAL Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-24 0:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923234127.EDD341F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox