BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/18] selftests/bpf: Cover the tail call caller stack depth limit
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:31:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924163144.1945455-10-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924163144.1945455-1-memxor@gmail.com>

A tail call from a subprog only unwinds that subprog's frame, so the
verifier refuses tail calls once the frames of the callers add up to
256 bytes or more. Nothing exercised that rule. Add a pair of tests
with a caller using 240 and 256 bytes of stack respectively, the
latter expecting the "tail_calls are not allowed when call stack of
previous frames is 256 bytes" rejection.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c   | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c
index b4acce60fb9b..51687da97225 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c
@@ -28,4 +28,61 @@ __naked void invalid_map_for_tail_call(void)
 	: __clobber_all);
 }
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+	__uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} jmp_table SEC(".maps");
+
+__used __naked
+static int subprog_tail_call(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("			\
+	r2 = %[jmp_table] ll;		\
+	r3 = 0;				\
+	call %[bpf_tail_call];		\
+	r0 = 0;				\
+	exit;				\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_tail_call),
+	  __imm_addr(jmp_table)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/*
+ * A tail call unwinds only the frame of the subprog doing it, so the
+ * frames of its callers stay on the stack. With up to 33 tail calls in
+ * a chain the verifier caps the stack those frames may add up to at
+ * 256 bytes.
+ */
+SEC("tc")
+__description("tail call from subprog with 240 bytes of caller stack")
+__success
+__naked void tail_call_caller_stack_ok(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("			\
+	r2 = 42;			\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 240) = r2;	\
+	call subprog_tail_call;		\
+	r0 = 0;				\
+	exit;				\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__description("tail call from subprog with 256 bytes of caller stack")
+__failure
+__msg("tail_calls are not allowed when call stack of previous frames is 256 bytes. Too large")
+__naked void tail_call_caller_stack_too_large(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("			\
+	r2 = 42;			\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 256) = r2;	\
+	call subprog_tail_call;		\
+	r0 = 0;				\
+	exit;				\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 16:31 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/18] Raise BPF program stack size to 2KiB Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/18] bpf: Add accessors for verifier stack slots Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/18] bpf: Widen the stack slot index in the jump history Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/18] bpf: Store linked registers in the jump history as an array Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/18] bpf: Track backtracking stack slots with bitmaps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/18] bpf: Track scratched stack slots with a bitmap Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/18] bpf: Treat unknown-size stack reads as reaching the frame top Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/18] bpf: Size liveness stack masks by the stack each frame uses Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/18] bpf: Grow the verifier id scratch on demand Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/18] selftests/bpf: Check that narrow stack stores define no slot Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/18] selftests/bpf: Check liveness merge of masks with different widths Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/18] bpf: Size the per-frame verifier structures for a 2 KiB stack Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/18] bpf: Bound program stack use by a per-program limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/18] selftests/bpf: Add load conditions on the program stack limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/18] selftests/bpf: Give the 512-byte stack boundary tests a 2 KiB twin Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/18] bpf, x86: Allow programs 2 KiB of stack Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/18] bpf, arm64: " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/18] selftests/bpf: Test the 2 KiB stack budget Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924163144.1945455-10-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kkd@meta.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox