From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/18] selftests/bpf: Check liveness merge of masks with different widths
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:57:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924165740.2146806-12-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924165740.2146806-1-memxor@gmail.com>
The liveness masks of a function instance are as wide as the deepest
half-slot the instance was seen to access. When the same instance is
analyzed again through another call site, the new pass may have settled
on a different width, and merge_instances() has to widen the original
before combining the two. Add a test where the first pass of a callee
reads through a pointer 248 bytes into the main frame and the second
one through a pointer of unknown offset, which reads the whole frame,
and check that the merged result keeps the whole-frame read. The
precise read stays within the first mask word on 64-bit, so the
whole-frame pass is wider under every stack budget and the merge has
to widen the masks; a deeper read would need two words already, which
is all a 512-byte whole-frame read needs on 64-bit, and the widening
would go untested there.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_live_stack.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_live_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_live_stack.c
index f8758eb62dac..c3b08089fef1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_live_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_live_stack.c
@@ -2861,3 +2861,54 @@ __naked void narrow_store_defines_nothing(void)
"exit;"
::: __clobber_all);
}
+
+/*
+ * The same callee instance is analyzed twice: the call sites are visited in
+ * postorder, so the second one goes first with a precise pointer 248 bytes
+ * into the main frame, and the first one then passes a pointer of unknown
+ * offset, which reads the whole frame. The precise pass stays within the
+ * first word of the masks on 64-bit, so the whole-frame pass is wider under
+ * every stack budget and merging the second into the first has to widen the
+ * masks while keeping the whole-frame read.
+ */
+SEC("socket")
+__log_level(2)
+__msg("stack use/def subprog#{{[0-9]+}} merge_read_all_callee (d2,cs{{[0-9]+}}):")
+__msg("(79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0){{.*}}; use: fp0-8..-512")
+__naked void merge_keeps_whole_frame_read(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 0;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 248) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
+ "r0 &= 8;"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -16;"
+ "r1 += r0;"
+ "call merge_read_all_mid;"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -248;"
+ "call merge_read_all_mid;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+static __used __naked void merge_read_all_mid(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "call merge_read_all_callee;"
+ "exit;"
+ ::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+static __used __naked void merge_read_all_callee(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);"
+ "exit;"
+ ::: __clobber_all);
+}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 16:57 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/18] Raise BPF program stack size to 2KiB Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/18] bpf: Add accessors for verifier stack slots Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/18] bpf: Widen the stack slot index in the jump history Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/18] bpf: Store linked registers in the jump history as an array Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/18] bpf: Track backtracking stack slots with bitmaps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/18] bpf: Track scratched stack slots with a bitmap Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/18] bpf: Treat unknown-size stack reads as reaching the frame top Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/18] bpf: Size liveness stack masks by the stack each frame uses Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/18] bpf: Grow the verifier id scratch on demand Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:38 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-24 18:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/18] selftests/bpf: Cover the tail call caller stack depth limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/18] selftests/bpf: Check that narrow stack stores define no slot Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/18] bpf: Size the per-frame verifier structures for a 2 KiB stack Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/18] bpf: Bound program stack use by a per-program limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/18] selftests/bpf: Add load conditions on the program stack limit Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/18] selftests/bpf: Give the 512-byte stack boundary tests a 2 KiB twin Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/18] bpf, x86: Allow programs 2 KiB of stack Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/18] bpf, arm64: " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/18] selftests/bpf: Test the 2 KiB stack budget Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 18:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/18] Raise BPF program stack size to 2KiB patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924165740.2146806-12-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox