From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE743E1688; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790709610; cv=none; b=pNhvp6JweoK4tMLVmRXVcBikEDOpQgE6TGpevzG22SfNNyJFtZPCn54mnlzSpiEvN/BYU9VRPB+gnRysGmXyahMJ72/YTHTu8zIXBZDjPDwYmRwE9c64ATiEyXmJp1WA/D6RhWSd3yfExvzM2wtdjyC0VIIr8OCyMMQiWZxav4w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790709610; c=relaxed/simple; bh=INxxy56tTTNw+wpmvRiYmVDphGb9zWgB4gZ+ry8gRW0=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=beuB51elEpumQk/SdjKsgpbXR3eVX1Gro6nb33dKqrr5bCWD2tfMbfQsvLi7e+zeioWMlBSYYHDBtRYf2SwxBYKGYBN5JSBQF8WTeQk2o95QQIb2x9WtFOUEgjpuBhE0hBoFiCo7L8h6XGKbcG1Bl4fV+6MgONeSOxR9ao22JXs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZKGb5R2d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZKGb5R2d" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3685E1F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:20:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790709608; bh=1qzlXq55cXRH/6p3qQnNSeSnAxfYu5OWeUNKOL/US2E=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZKGb5R2d374v1LRq7wiR3R1ggnPfwavym/M4QTFMYd8WJIg/t7tfDHAyCJZ/i3mrD 82dOd8t1jACgvggImdJMWnGyq/3EQ2AYnzkcMRDk4XYM0KIyiiSeVMmUidKeYWnCeJ f3LJ39UzwYFH78iyA5fp9YH/A4qW0N+v9VNGcnFE7sDnfu3MlUks5rOby8QFvsVK5G HtsxGH1g0n3xref7194ZS8AIITzE5eV0Jx4XalH8H9/gveH7X+xKJ6Zv8dh321pLzs yXS0BBlRsn4CbTOkmq7M0PINP/mca0aTFT3YdrBANMha45wIDUB7/A9lyW/Q45H925 67xW/36ltJ+Og== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 5.15 2/2] perf test bpf: Address error about non-null argument for epoll_pwait 2nd arg Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Florian Fainelli" Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260929191541.264038-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> References: <20260929191541.264038-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> <20260929191541.264038-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:20:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20260929192008.3685E1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > commit ed847e30f001b207013b6136c264454d7560557f upstream >=20 > First noticed on Fedora Rawhide: >=20 > tests/bpf.c: In function =E2=80=98epoll_pwait_loop=E2=80=99: > tests/bpf.c:36:17: error: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Wer= ror=3Dnonnull] > 36 | epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from tests/bpf.c:5: > /usr/include/sys/epoll.h:134:12: note: in a call to function =E2=80=98e= poll_pwait=E2=80=99 declared =E2=80=98nonnull=E2=80=99 > 134 | extern int epoll_pwait (int __epfd, struct epoll_event *__event= s, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >=20 > [ ... ] > Cc: Jiri Olsa > Cc: Namhyung Kim > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZMj8+bvN86D0ZKiB@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929191541.2640= 38-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com?part=3D2