From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] kprobes: Make optprobe optimizer multi-generational and asynchronous
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:10:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930001024.4F2371F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179072636063.409480.10967951178575355535.stgit@devnote2>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kprobes: 100% CPU busy-loop livelock when flushing optimizer
- [High] kprobes: memory leak of optinsn slots during async unoptimization
--
commit 9f64df8dc4c148639fefa4dcd4859438e335848a
Author: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
kprobes: Make optprobe optimizer multi-generational and asynchronous
This patch decouples kprobe jump optimization from synchronous waiting by
moving to an asynchronous, multi-generational model using call_rcu_tasks().
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 4edd8ca5c6578..377fa9bfa0291 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -588,17 +653,25 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void)
[ ... ]
> -/* Reclaim all kprobes on the 'freeing_list' */
> -static void do_free_cleaned_kprobes(void)
> +/* Reclaim all kprobes on the 'free_list' */
> +static void do_free_cleaned_kprobes(struct list_head *free_list)
> {
> struct optimized_kprobe *op, *tmp;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(op, tmp, &freeing_list, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(op, tmp, free_list, list) {
> + struct kprobe *_p;
> +
> list_del_init(&op->list);
[ ... ]
> - struct kprobe *_p = get_optimized_kprobe(op->kp.addr);
> + _p = get_optimized_kprobe(op->kp.addr);
> if (unlikely(_p))
> optimize_kprobe(_p);
>
> - free_aggr_kprobe(&op->kp);
> + free_aggr_kprobe(&op->kp);
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
Does this leak the dynamically allocated optinsn memory slots?
Later in the patch, kill_optimized_kprobe() is modified to intentionally
defer calling arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(op) if the probe is queued,
leaving the optimizer to reclaim it after the quiescence period.
However, when do_free_cleaned_kprobes() runs to reclaim the probe after the
grace period, free_aggr_kprobe() only frees the kprobe struct. Without a
call to arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(op) here, the executable memory slots
allocated for the optimized kprobes appear to be permanently leaked.
[ ... ]
> @@ -624,67 +696,138 @@ static void do_free_cleaned_kprobes(void)
[ ... ]
> +/* Kprobe jump optimizer */
> +static void kprobe_optimizer(void)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /* Step 3: Wake up flushers and kick optimizer again if needed */
> optimizer_passes++;
> wake_up_var_locked(&optimizer_passes, &kprobe_mutex);
[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally incrementing optimizer_passes here cause a 100% CPU
busy-loop livelock?
When wait_for_kprobe_optimizer_locked() is called while a Tasks RCU grace
period is in flight, it sees optprobe_optimizer_busy() is true and wakes the
optimizer thread.
The optimizer thread wakes up, clears its flushing state, and calls
kprobe_optimizer(). Since the RCU callback hasn't fired yet, it makes no
progress but unconditionally increments optimizer_passes here.
This wakes wait_for_kprobe_optimizer_locked(), which loops, wakes the
optimizer again, and waits for another optimizer_passes change. Both threads
could spin in this tight loop until the Tasks RCU grace period completes.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/179072636063.409480.10967951178575355535.stgit@devnote2?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 23:59 [RESEND PATCH v2] kprobes: Make optprobe optimizer multi-generational and asynchronous Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-30 0:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-30 1:33 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930001024.4F2371F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox