From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BA313815DE; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 16:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790871131; cv=none; b=JoTC1wD8MCfl1ySr2UrkKJsyyem2spRUXIorvdanxy6P+KCzNMotI6ao7Kvx0+pe01+yAbu6lOAPw/2BATvb71QwJF+45NchVWvCZBvaUrviP6pzbrOtGC/bxA/07OW9NGb3ieJELX6GuGlxs08KOQZk2fcOrtSd5oHV35jr6co= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790871131; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0p16GShUQodnrorTlXklQYvwCZZ8PxBeyWesheEwh7c=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=T6UMGcr66D32KNL1jnQngs35DmyCWr9dFr2xgV45Ld2M1FMCpnTcnrjo+TEuGXK+Bzq0FkU8r4CsEXIT06/cZDPnTiZC7Ta2u6mAhy2MvirOC5RZuQ0v8d+31WAhkS5IjoBXQEsHPceu85GV58lk5wqWW0moccsOQLbKRAVPmQ4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iscanODI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iscanODI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC5201F000FF; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 16:12:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790871130; bh=v5qed4INy2lQqb9dq8qW6fGvevy5vLR+rm0OKi9YzHA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=iscanODI0kZkWMrv6fnB+kFGu8Ow9e86hHgEcqzJSyU8Ekyy1dR2p8s5kpdVU19ny WE8yRF97cZ9sX1Cwk74hFcFiHYox61k2+MlXoe+Y85BlEnJVK1WmWcCrk6qcqQ1rcu zL+jgeB4MEEjpAJhT60xCyJ9lin+ehES+2U+5tKBzDzYbTJATpYPL7aCeM2iFwhKZx iJqw2Nvhl/m3i9tAtSbG7uEtUcxGSkiNT6ZifVOhdMfP6qTyT+mZLilESY6Ovc9wqN 3hao5acwECIAW8DUBj2DQC20IMieHI4my6KbtqqtVJoTT6aFlNILWXUJQNtm2eIQsn qpNlhyEar4xtA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 5.10 2/2] perf test bpf: Address error about non-null argument for epoll_pwait 2nd arg Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Florian Fainelli" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261001160114.801948-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> References: <20261001160114.801948-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> <20261001160114.801948-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 16:12:08 +0000 Message-Id: <20261001161209.DC5201F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > commit ed847e30f001b207013b6136c264454d7560557f upstream. >=20 > First noticed on Fedora Rawhide: >=20 > tests/bpf.c: In function =E2=80=98epoll_pwait_loop=E2=80=99: > tests/bpf.c:36:17: error: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Wer= ror=3Dnonnull] > 36 | epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from tests/bpf.c:5: > /usr/include/sys/epoll.h:134:12: note: in a call to function =E2=80=98e= poll_pwait=E2=80=99 declared =E2=80=98nonnull=E2=80=99 > 134 | extern int epoll_pwait (int __epfd, struct epoll_event *__event= s, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >=20 > [ ... ] > Cc: Jiri Olsa > Cc: Namhyung Kim > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZMj8+bvN86D0ZKiB@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001160114.8019= 48-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com?part=3D2