From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/23] bpf: Make exception landing pads reachable in the CFG
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 00:50:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008075030.2998230-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008074959.2993751-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
A call that a cleanup record covers can also reach the record's landing
pad. Add that edge to the CFG walk, to bpf_insn_successors(), and to
stack liveness, where a slot is alive across a call when the call's pad
reads it.
The CFG walk pushes the pad in a visit of its own, and the fall-through
on the next visit. bpf_check_cfg() re-visits the top of its stack until
DONE_EXPLORING, so a visit pushing both would leave the pad DISCOVERED
off the current path, and push_insn() would take a branch from one pad
into another -- how a frame with two regions chains them -- for a
back-edge.
Without the liveness change, a slot only the pad reads looked dead, and
clean_verifier_state() poisoned it while the callee ran.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/cfg.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/liveness.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cfg.c b/kernel/bpf/cfg.c
index d8a579680e5b..63afbc5fb296 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cfg.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cfg.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include "diagnostics.h"
+#include "exception.h"
#define verbose(env, fmt, args...) bpf_verifier_log_write(env, fmt, ##args)
@@ -160,6 +161,38 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return DONE_EXPLORING;
}
+static int visit_cleanup_pad_edge(int t, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ int *insn_stack = env->cfg.insn_stack;
+ int *insn_state = env->cfg.insn_state;
+ int w;
+
+ if (!env->cleanup_info_cnt)
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
+ w = bpf_exc_pad_of_call(env, t);
+ if (w < 0)
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
+
+ /*
+ * @t is a call that may branch here, and @w is the target of that
+ * branch, so both are prune points. @w especially: every covered call
+ * site in a region unwinds to the same pad, and without a prune point
+ * at its head the verifier walks the pad again for each of them.
+ */
+ mark_prune_point(env, t);
+ mark_prune_point(env, w);
+ mark_jmp_point(env, w);
+ mark_jump_target(env, w);
+
+ if (insn_state[w])
+ return DONE_EXPLORING;
+ if (env->cfg.cur_stack >= env->prog->len)
+ return -E2BIG;
+ insn_stack[env->cfg.cur_stack++] = w;
+ insn_state[w] |= DISCOVERED;
+ return KEEP_EXPLORING;
+}
+
static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, struct bpf_insn *insns,
struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
bool visit_callee)
@@ -167,6 +200,11 @@ static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, struct bpf_insn *insns,
int ret, insn_sz;
int w;
+ /* One push per visit: @t is revisited once the pad is explored. */
+ ret = visit_cleanup_pad_edge(t, env);
+ if (ret != DONE_EXPLORING)
+ return ret;
+
insn_sz = bpf_is_ldimm64(&insns[t]) ? 2 : 1;
ret = push_insn(t, t + insn_sz, FALLTHROUGH, env);
if (ret)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/liveness.c b/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
index cd9523f69298..2e7eead71c93 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/liveness.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include "exception.h"
+
#define verbose(env, fmt, args...) bpf_verifier_log_write(env, fmt, ##args)
/*
@@ -384,6 +386,18 @@ bpf_insn_successors(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 idx)
succ->items[succ->cnt++] = exit_idx;
}
+ /*
+ * A covered call can also leave through its landing pad. Only a call to
+ * a subprog or to bpf_unwind() is covered, so the two entries of
+ * env->succ are enough.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(env->cleanup_info_cnt)) {
+ int pad = bpf_exc_pad_of_call(env, idx);
+
+ if (pad >= 0)
+ succ->items[succ->cnt++] = pad;
+ }
+
return succ;
}
@@ -510,7 +524,8 @@ bool bpf_stack_slot_alive(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 frameno, u32 half_sp
* Slot is alive if it is read before q->insn_idx in current func instance,
* or if for some outer func instance:
* - alive before callsite if callsite calls callback or is callx, otherwise
- * - alive after callsite
+ * - alive after callsite,
+ * - or alive at the landing pad a cleanup record gives the callsite
*/
struct live_stack_query *q = &env->liveness->live_stack_query;
struct func_instance *instance, *curframe_instance;
@@ -545,6 +560,13 @@ bool bpf_stack_slot_alive(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 frameno, u32 half_sp
alive = callee_stack_access_at_callsite(env, callsite)
? is_live_before(instance, callsite, rel, half_spi)
: is_live_before(instance, callsite + 1, rel, half_spi);
+
+ if (!alive && unlikely(env->cleanup_info_cnt)) {
+ int pad = bpf_exc_pad_of_call(env, callsite);
+
+ if (pad >= 0)
+ alive = is_live_before(instance, pad, rel, half_spi);
+ }
if (alive)
return true;
}
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 7:49 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/23] bpf: Run exception cleanup landing pads when bpf_unwind() unwinds Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/23] bpf: Pack bpf_insn_aux_data flags into bit fields Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/23] bpf: Accept the compiler's exception cleanup table at program load Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/23] bpf: Add the bpf_unwind() and bpf_unwind_resume() kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/23] bpf: Keep a call site's landing pad in insn_aux_data, add lookups Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 8:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 15:58 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/23] bpf: Mark covered call sites and check a program can take a table Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/23] bpf: Verify an unwind through landing pads and epilogues Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 8:57 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-08 16:07 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/23] bpf: Refuse a landing pad that does not resume Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 8:57 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-08 16:11 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/23] bpf: Do not use a private stack for a program that can unwind Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/23] bpf: Prepare JITed programs for dispatching cleanup pads Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/23] bpf: Dispatch cleanup pads by rewriting return addresses Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 12/23] bpf: Refuse a trampoline that calls a subprog that can unwind Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 16:19 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 13/23] bpf, x86: Dispatch exception cleanup pads at run time Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 14/23] bpf, arm64: " Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 8:39 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-08 16:23 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 15/23] libbpf: Resolve the compiler's _Unwind_Resume to the kernel's kfunc Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 16/23] libbpf: Add cleanup_info to bpf_prog_load_opts Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 8:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 16:25 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 17/23] libbpf: Collect .bpf_cleanup records and pass them to the kernel Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 18/23] libbpf: Carry the exception cleanup table through the light skeleton Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 19/23] libbpf: Let the static linker carry .bpf_cleanup relocations Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 16:26 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 20/23] selftests/bpf: Add end-to-end and negative .bpf_cleanup exception tests Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/23] selftests/bpf: Add __set_global() and __ret_global() test tags Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/23] selftests/bpf: Cover more accepted .bpf_cleanup exception shapes Yonghong Song
2026-10-08 7:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 23/23] selftests/bpf: Load an exception cleanup program from a light skeleton Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008075030.2998230-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox