BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, emil@etsalapatis.com,
	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y 1/2] bpf: copy_verifier_state() should copy 'loop_entry' field
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 22:20:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016022011.16938-2-artem@trailofbits.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016022011.16938-1-artem@trailofbits.com>

From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit bbbc02b7445ebfda13e4847f4f1413c6480a85a9 ]

The bpf_verifier_state.loop_entry state should be copied by
copy_verifier_state(). Otherwise, .loop_entry values from unrelated
states would poison env->cur_state.

Additionally, env->stack should not contain any states with
.loop_entry != NULL. The states in env->stack are yet to be verified,
while .loop_entry is set for states that reached an equivalent state.
This means that env->cur_state->loop_entry should always be NULL after
pop_stack().

See the selftest in the next commit for an example of the program that
is not safe yet is accepted by verifier w/o this fix.

This change has some verification performance impact for selftests:

File                                Program                       Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns   (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF)
----------------------------------  ----------------------------  ---------  ---------  --------------  ----------  ----------  -------------
arena_htab.bpf.o                    arena_htab_llvm                     717        426  -291 (-40.59%)          57          37  -20 (-35.09%)
arena_htab_asm.bpf.o                arena_htab_asm                      597        445  -152 (-25.46%)          47          37  -10 (-21.28%)
arena_list.bpf.o                    arena_list_del                      309        279    -30 (-9.71%)          23          14   -9 (-39.13%)
iters.bpf.o                         iter_subprog_check_stacksafe        155        141    -14 (-9.03%)          15          14    -1 (-6.67%)
iters.bpf.o                         iter_subprog_iters                 1094       1003    -91 (-8.32%)          88          83    -5 (-5.68%)
iters.bpf.o                         loop_state_deps2                    479        725  +246 (+51.36%)          46          63  +17 (+36.96%)
kmem_cache_iter.bpf.o               open_coded_iter                      63         59     -4 (-6.35%)           7           6   -1 (-14.29%)
verifier_bits_iter.bpf.o            max_words                            92         84     -8 (-8.70%)           8           7   -1 (-12.50%)
verifier_iterating_callbacks.bpf.o  cond_break2                         113        107     -6 (-5.31%)          12          12    +0 (+0.00%)

And significant negative impact for sched_ext:

File               Program                 Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns         (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States      (DIFF)
-----------------  ----------------------  ---------  ---------  --------------------  ----------  ----------  ------------------
bpf.bpf.o          lavd_init                    7039      14723      +7684 (+109.16%)         490        1139     +649 (+132.45%)
bpf.bpf.o          layered_dispatch            11485      10548         -937 (-8.16%)         848         762       -86 (-10.14%)
bpf.bpf.o          layered_dump                 7422    1000001  +992579 (+13373.47%)         681       31178  +30497 (+4478.27%)
bpf.bpf.o          layered_enqueue             16854      71127     +54273 (+322.02%)        1611        6450    +4839 (+300.37%)
bpf.bpf.o          p2dq_dispatch                 665        791        +126 (+18.95%)          68          78       +10 (+14.71%)
bpf.bpf.o          p2dq_init                    2343       2980        +637 (+27.19%)         201         237       +36 (+17.91%)
bpf.bpf.o          refresh_layer_cpumasks      16487     674760   +658273 (+3992.68%)        1770       65370  +63600 (+3593.22%)
bpf.bpf.o          rusty_select_cpu             1937      40872    +38935 (+2010.07%)         177        3210   +3033 (+1713.56%)
scx_central.bpf.o  central_dispatch              636       2687      +2051 (+322.48%)          63         227     +164 (+260.32%)
scx_nest.bpf.o     nest_init                     636        815        +179 (+28.14%)          60          73       +13 (+21.67%)
scx_qmap.bpf.o     qmap_dispatch                2393       3580       +1187 (+49.60%)         196         253       +57 (+29.08%)
scx_qmap.bpf.o     qmap_dump                     233        318         +85 (+36.48%)          22          30        +8 (+36.36%)
scx_qmap.bpf.o     qmap_init                   16367      17436        +1069 (+6.53%)         603         669       +66 (+10.95%)

Note 'layered_dump' program, which now hits 1M instructions limit.
This impact would be mitigated in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250215110411.3236773-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Artem Dinaburg <artem@trailofbits.com>
---
Hi,

Please consider this backport of the fix for CVE-2025-38060 to 6.6.y.

The code changes are identical to upstream.

The complete fix is already present in 6.12.y, 6.18.y and 7.2.y.

Build-tested only as part of a cumulative 6.6.y series on x86_64
(allmodconfig, CONFIG_WERROR=y); no runtime testing.

Thanks,
Artem Dinaburg

 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 778a68bfb91dd4e765252cfb1bacb4b658d1381b..c00113e691955a6c9c6caa56007ccf90ce9b87d8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state,
 	dst_state->dfs_depth = src->dfs_depth;
 	dst_state->callback_unroll_depth = src->callback_unroll_depth;
 	dst_state->used_as_loop_entry = src->used_as_loop_entry;
+	dst_state->loop_entry = src->loop_entry;
 	for (i = 0; i <= src->curframe; i++) {
 		dst = dst_state->frame[i];
 		if (!dst) {
@@ -17561,6 +17562,8 @@ process_bpf_exit:
 						return err;
 					break;
 				} else {
+					if (WARN_ON_ONCE(env->cur_state->loop_entry))
+						env->cur_state->loop_entry = NULL;
 					do_print_state = true;
 					continue;
 				}

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-16  2:20 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/2] CVE-2025-38060: backport fix series Artem Dinaburg
2026-10-16  2:20 ` Artem Dinaburg [this message]
2026-10-16  2:20 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/2] bpf: abort verification if env->cur_state->loop_entry != NULL Artem Dinaburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261016022011.16938-2-artem@trailofbits.com \
    --to=artem@trailofbits.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox