From: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] arm64, bpf: JIT internal IRQ save and restore instructions
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:28:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261027162820.10887-4-emil@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027162820.10887-1-emil@etsalapatis.com>
Implement the internal IRQ save/restore instruction in the arm64 JIT,
using the encoded destination register as the flags pointer.
Support both DAIF masking and GIC priority masking. Preserve the existing
priority-mask synchronization requirements when restoring interrupt
state, and decline inlining when IRQ tracing or priority-mask debugging
is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h | 8 ++++++++
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
index b2fe6e6dcf44..23cbc38510a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#define _BPF_JIT_H
#include <asm/insn.h>
+#include <asm/sysreg.h>
/* 5-bit Register Operand */
#define A64_R(x) AARCH64_INSN_REG_##x
@@ -338,6 +339,13 @@
#define A64_MRS_SP_EL0(Rt) \
aarch64_insn_gen_mrs(Rt, AARCH64_INSN_SYSREG_SP_EL0)
+#define A64_MRS_SYSREG(Rt, SysReg) \
+ (aarch64_insn_get_mrs_value() | (SysReg) | (Rt))
+#define A64_MSR_SYSREG(Rt, SysReg) \
+ (aarch64_insn_get_msr_reg_value() | (SysReg) | (Rt))
+#define A64_MSR_DAIFSET(Imm) \
+ (aarch64_insn_get_msr_imm_value() | pstate_field(3, 6) | ((Imm) << PSTATE_Imm_shift))
+
/* Barriers */
#define A64_SB aarch64_insn_get_sb_value()
#define A64_DSB_NSH (aarch64_insn_get_dsb_base_value() | 0x7 << 8)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 326e9e1dea0a..b7f4e4b68e9d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
#include <asm/insn.h>
+#include <asm/irqflags.h>
#include <asm/text-patching.h>
#include "bpf_jit.h"
@@ -2031,6 +2032,33 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_insn
}
break;
+ case BPF_ST | BPF_IRQ:
+ {
+ bool pmr = system_uses_irq_prio_masking();
+ u32 sysreg = pmr ? SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1 : sys_reg(3, 3, 4, 2, 1);
+
+ if (imm == BPF_IRQ_SAVE) {
+ emit(A64_MRS_SYSREG(tmp, sysreg), ctx);
+ if (pmr) {
+ emit(A64_CMP_I(1, tmp, GIC_PRIO_IRQON), ctx);
+ emit(A64_B_(A64_COND_NE, 3), ctx);
+ emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp2, GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF, ctx);
+ emit(A64_MSR_SYSREG(tmp2, sysreg), ctx);
+ } else {
+ emit(A64_MSR_DAIFSET(3), ctx);
+ }
+ emit(A64_STR64I(tmp, dst, 0), ctx);
+ } else if (imm == BPF_IRQ_RESTORE) {
+ emit(A64_LDR64I(tmp, dst, 0), ctx);
+ emit(A64_MSR_SYSREG(tmp, sysreg), ctx);
+ if (pmr && !alternative_has_cap_likely(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_RELAXED_SYNC))
+ emit(aarch64_insn_gen_dsb(AARCH64_INSN_MB_SY), ctx);
+ } else {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
@@ -3537,6 +3565,12 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn(void)
return true;
}
+bool bpf_jit_supports_irq_save_restore(void)
+{
+ return !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) &&
+ !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING);
+}
+
bool bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4(void)
{
/* In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation of Speculative
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 16:28 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Inline IRQ enter/exit instructions Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Add internal IRQ save and restore instructions Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] x86, bpf: JIT " Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:28 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-10-27 17:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] arm64, " bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] bpf: Inline local IRQ kfunc calls during verifier fixup Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] selftests/bpf: Test local IRQ kfunc inlining Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 17:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: Enable fastcall for inlined local IRQ kfuncs Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Verify register preservation for IRQ fastcalls Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 17:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-27 16:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Inline IRQ enter/exit instructions Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-28 1:55 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-28 16:56 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261027162820.10887-4-emil@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox