BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Meta kernel team" <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf, cgroup: Don't attach to a removed cgroup
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:27:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112172721.440275-3-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112172721.440275-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

Attach gets the cgroup from an fd before it takes cgroup_mutex.  If the
cgroup is removed in between and cgroup_bpf_release() runs first, attach
adds a program that never runs:

- With BPF_PROG_ATTACH the program leaks, since nothing can detach it.
- With a link that uses cgroup storage, the storage stays on the freed
  cgroup's list, and freeing the map later writes to the freed cgroup.
- A cgroup struct_ops link is attached but never called.

The window is small today because the release work also waits for
cgroup_mutex.  The next patch stops that, which makes the race easy to
hit.

Check cgroup_is_dead() under the lock and return -ENOENT, the error the
fd lookup gives for a removed cgroup.  rmdir marks the cgroup dead under
cgroup_mutex before it starts the release, so the check is exact.

Reproduced in a VM with debug-only delays.  With the next patch applied,
a link attach queued behind a slow mkdir lands on the released cgroup,
and freeing the map then hits a KASAN use-after-free in
cgroup_storage_map_free().  BPF_PROG_ATTACH leaks the program.  With
this patch, attach returns -ENOENT.

Fixes: 4bfc0bb2c60e ("bpf: decouple the lifetime of cgroup_bpf from cgroup itself")
Fixes: 369d9dcd8fb8 ("bpf: Add infrastructure to support attaching struct_ops to cgroups")
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index 9258c2669fa8..334237096759 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -988,6 +988,13 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp,
 		/* replace_prog implies BPF_F_REPLACE, and vice versa */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/*
+	 * The cgroup may have been removed since the caller looked it up.
+	 * Then its bpf state may be freed, and nothing would detach this.
+	 */
+	if (cgroup_is_dead(cgrp))
+		return -ENOENT;
+
 	atype = bpf_cgroup_atype_find(type, new_prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
 	if (atype < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -3170,6 +3177,12 @@ int cgroup_bpf_struct_ops_attach(struct bpf_map *map, const union bpf_attr *attr
 
 	cgroup_lock();
 
+	/* See the cgroup_is_dead() check in __cgroup_bpf_attach() */
+	if (cgroup_is_dead(cgrp)) {
+		err = -ENOENT;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+
 	if (attr->link_create.cgroup.expected_revision &&
 	    attr->link_create.cgroup.expected_revision != cgrp->bpf.revisions[atype]) {
 		err = -ESTALE;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 17:27 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf, cgroup: Don't wait for cgroup_mutex to read or free cgroup bpf state Shakeel Butt
2026-11-12 17:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf, cgroup: Don't read freed effective arrays in BPF_PROG_QUERY Shakeel Butt
2026-11-12 17:27 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-11-12 17:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf, cgroup: Protect cgroup_bpf state with its own mutex Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261112172721.440275-3-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox