BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: "Hudson, Nick" <nhudson@akamai.com>
Cc: "sashiko@lists.linux.dev" <sashiko@lists.linux.dev>,
	 "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] selftests/bpf: tc_tunnel - validate decap GSO and encapsulation state
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 08:49:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026521154338.mbd8.martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56083B7A-B13B-4133-8857-FAD8201F6D7C@akamai.com>

On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 10:52:12AM +0000, Hudson, Nick wrote:
> 
> 
> > On May 5, 2026, at 5:14 AM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > 
> > !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
> >  This Message Is From an External Sender
> >  This message came from outside your organization.
> > |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
> > 
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > - [High] Pointer arithmetic `kskb->head + kskb->end` causes build failures and runtime logic errors on 32-bit kernels.
> > - [Medium] Missing kernel feature causes test to fail instead of skip, breaking CI on older kernels.
> > --
> > 
> > commit f73fb4725baa7b601a1b82c32e5095c6b4294f5c
> > Author: Nick Hudson <nhudson@akamai.com>
> > 
> > selftests/bpf: tc_tunnel - validate decap GSO and encapsulation state
> > 
> > This commit enhances the tc_tunnel selftest to validate post-decap tunnel
> > state for both GSO and non-GSO packets, and checks IPXIP decap for IPIP/SIT
> > paths.
> > 
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_tunnel.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_tunnel.c
> >> index 7376df405a6b..853bca962910 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_tunnel.c
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_tunnel.c
> > [ ... ]
> >> @@ -621,6 +645,11 @@ static int decap_internal(struct __sk_buff *skb, int off, int len, char proto)
> >> break;
> >> case IPPROTO_GRE:
> >> olen += sizeof(struct gre_hdr);
> >> + if (!bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_adj_room_flags,
> >> + BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_L4_GRE))
> >> + return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> > 
> > If the kernel is missing support for these new decapsulation flags, will
> > returning TC_ACT_SHOT cause the test harness to time out and fail the test?
> > 
> > Since selftests often run on older kernels, should missing features gracefully
> > skip the test instead of failing it to prevent false positives and CI
> > breakages on stable or LTS branches?
> 
> The current TC_ACT_SHOT fallback prevents silent passes, but it does cause affected subtests to fail on kernels without the new decap flags. We should move feature gating to prog_tests and skip unsupported subtests there, so older kernels report SKIP instead of FAIL while preserving strict checks when the feature exists.

imo, it is fine to stay as-is and fail early instead of skip.
The new test added to the -next is targeting the new feature
of the upstream kernel. The new test is not supposed to be backported
alone without backporting the kernel changes.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-21 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-04 10:17 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/6] bpf: decap flags and GSO state updates Nick Hudson
2026-05-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] bpf: name the enum for BPF_FUNC_skb_adjust_room flags Nick Hudson
2026-05-04 11:03   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] bpf: refactor masks for ADJ_ROOM flags and encap validation Nick Hudson
2026-05-04 11:03   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-19 10:40     ` Hudson, Nick
2026-05-04 17:14   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] bpf: add BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_DECAP_* flags for tunnel decapsulation Nick Hudson
2026-05-04 11:03   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-05  4:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:45     ` Hudson, Nick
2026-05-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] bpf: allow new DECAP flags and add guard rails Nick Hudson
2026-05-05  4:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] bpf: clear decap state on skb_adjust_room shrink path Nick Hudson
2026-05-04 17:15   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-05  4:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] selftests/bpf: tc_tunnel - validate decap GSO and encapsulation state Nick Hudson
2026-05-05  4:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:52     ` Hudson, Nick
2026-05-21 15:49       ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026521154338.mbd8.martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhudson@akamai.com \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox