From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 767B818E76F; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737357915; cv=none; b=r5kFVHcquIvPE41bGQAHtmzyp7aKAjpgp4XKU/UZW0ad0YtZdZymzMBZLkfK4edXZjph4IAzfFnrJrZ77Qz4hsX9jGoYI4vdmRbnx+pRjiGPix6gxwcEOtKSDFqhyTmL9OTslICoCMXPtAj843gT19f23eSZoT2SyCMyokQnpl4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737357915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k4ykqooUPTL/roXw/fFpliH2XGWlf7OfDPK35rRh9HA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nIePsndoVQMTt/rKue3No0ShgbX5sEofY2RfKzNIynwokt1USkMSkDvvbuSG1CpZmbSEesbc7FGvisZ6Zk4qXSAIV9sJgUWdNbncVayuENLudw+OgEH1JYooiFBjT8igsvrVbKPn4DfxM1iqejO1LyzH7lF8Siv77FAXO0fWpjs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Yy4zCkjS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Yy4zCkjS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1737357913; x=1768893913; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k4ykqooUPTL/roXw/fFpliH2XGWlf7OfDPK35rRh9HA=; b=Yy4zCkjScxKE/31Z8LuC1hzfDmi3Ba3qksEZBqe3zzAOTkQJPZny9SIG Xv24gcEtk5tQ4YKn98a11s/pOonob70UcPV1Qfq1IGEsFMJJHQUh7xkvL zPcpnXghJ6ccDihKLiTO2jsXjDvgeofT9l4xhxqAoROr75/LKvjEGf8M1 JlwQnP7Yj556oVLnGgKuTnzrvDyBcXXbPx4zXg7SmHXFwFWMuxjj65zQT Ela2XeHkh5o9FLHPpNTc5phEw9SVK9wPMQEKCLf9qKcedOFXWICGArhyJ SmMqCbUcpfEbNXhOooPJYFrMLtCMFXRtAEoOzh8nhNijZUpqAF5Mdya6M w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ULi5aLoRQOC6Qix1bbBL3A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CkL7rpwuT8aK7RbN+EKUpg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11320"; a="37601860" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,218,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="37601860" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2025 23:25:12 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vyQrnkD1RKuZNocxarZucg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4NfaGBcnSKmXfEo/7NNF7Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,218,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="106224522" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.107.2.109]) ([10.107.2.109]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2025 23:25:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20fa0b55-405c-4b7c-8c10-1f8d71c956b9@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:24:46 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] igc: Add launch time support to XDP ZC To: "Abdul Rahim, Faizal" , Song Yoong Siang , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Willem de Bruijn , Florian Bezdeka , Donald Hunter , Jonathan Corbet , Bjorn Topel , Magnus Karlsson , Maciej Fijalkowski , Jonathan Lemon , Andrew Lunn , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Joe Damato , Stanislav Fomichev , Xuan Zhuo , Mina Almasry , Daniel Jurgens , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Mykola Lysenko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Shuah Khan , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Maxime Coquelin , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, xdp-hints@xdp-project.net References: <20250116155350.555374-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com> <20250116155350.555374-5-yoong.siang.song@intel.com> <84770113-2546-4035-8bd4-bf9cedcfb00f@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Choong Yong Liang In-Reply-To: <84770113-2546-4035-8bd4-bf9cedcfb00f@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 20/1/2025 2:25 pm, Abdul Rahim, Faizal wrote: > > To be cautious, could we perform a stress test by sending a higher number > of packets with launch time? For example, we could send 200 packets, each > configured with a launch time, and verify that the driver continues to > function correctly afterward. > I agree on this point. Could you perform the same stress test on the STMMAC driver as well?