From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] bpf: Rely on callback frame initialization defaults
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:13:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <224a0979-779b-4c7a-903b-7c3ac98a3d5a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-202390@kernel.org>
On 11/6/26 4:48 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
> in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
> introduce:
> - [Critical] bpf: missing callback dynptr invalidation in
> prepare_func_exit() [1]
> --
>
> commit 468e6b1f0288b436ee1abb6fdbf7f6a231d967b2
> Author: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
>
> bpf: Rely on callback frame initialization defaults
>
> This commit removes redundant NOT_INIT register resets and default return
> range assignments from BPF verifier callback state setters, relying on the
> defaults already set by init_func_state().
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index 389488e4e7a74..831a9c0f8c458 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -12126,15 +12110,9 @@ static int set_user_ringbuf_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>> * callback_ctx, u64 flags);
>> * callback_fn(const struct bpf_dynptr_t* dynptr, void *callback_ctx);
>> */
>> - bpf_mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_0]);
>> mark_dynptr_cb_reg(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_1], BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL);
>> callee->regs[BPF_REG_2] = caller->regs[BPF_REG_3];
>>
>> - /* unused */
>> - bpf_mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_3]);
>> - bpf_mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
>> - bpf_mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
>> -
>> callee->in_callback_fn = true;
>> callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1);
>> return 0;
>
> [Severity: Critical]
> This problem wasn't introduced by this patch [1], but can the
> callback dynptr in R1 or a slice derived from it escape into a caller's
> stack frame via R2 (callback_ctx)?
Yeah. This is exactly what is addressed by the series
"bpf: Scope callback arguments to their frame":
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20261106231157.2840635-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev/
>
> mark_dynptr_cb_reg() initializes R1 as a CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR with a fresh
> id and parent_id set to 0. When callback_ctx points into an outer stack
> frame, check_stack_write_fixed_off() only blocks spilling PTR_TO_STACK
> into a caller's frame, so the callback can spill R1, spill a PTR_TO_MEM
> slice derived from R1, or clone R1 into the caller's stack via
> bpf_dynptr_clone().
>
> On callback return, prepare_func_exit() calls
> destroy_dynptrs_in_stack_slots() only on the callee's own stack frame and
> never invalidates references tied to R1's id in outer frames. Because the
> underlying struct bpf_dynptr_kern lives on the kernel C stack of
> bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() and the sample is released after each callback
> invocation, the escaped dynptr or slice remains accessible in the caller
> after bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() returns, leading to kernel stack
> use-after-return and use-after-release of user ring buffer samples.
>
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-05b65197-996a-40dd-bf7b-7710de2720b4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 23:21 [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] bpf: Share map-backed callback register setup Ihor Solodrai
2026-11-06 23:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] bpf: Rely on callback frame initialization defaults Ihor Solodrai
2026-11-06 23:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 0:13 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=224a0979-779b-4c7a-903b-7c3ac98a3d5a@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).