public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Yauheni Kaliuta <ykaliuta@redhat.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] tracing: perf_call_bpf: use struct trace_entry in struct syscall_tp_t
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:44:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <225ed430-dfd1-bf0b-8481-58f5f0d3f7eb@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728142740.483431-1-ykaliuta@redhat.com>



On 7/28/23 7:27 AM, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote:
> bpf tracepoint program uses struct trace_event_raw_sys_enter as
> argument where trace_entry is the first field. Use the same instead
> of unsigned long long since if it's amended (for example by RT
> patch) it accesses data with wrong offset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <ykaliuta@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - remove extra BUILD_BUG_ON
> - add structure alignement
> 
> ---
>   kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 12 ++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> index 942ddbdace4a..b7139f8f4ce8 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> @@ -555,12 +555,15 @@ static int perf_call_bpf_enter(struct trace_event_call *call, struct pt_regs *re
>   			       struct syscall_trace_enter *rec)
>   {
>   	struct syscall_tp_t {
> -		unsigned long long regs;
> +		struct trace_entry ent;
>   		unsigned long syscall_nr;
>   		unsigned long args[SYSCALL_DEFINE_MAXARGS];
> -	} param;
> +	} __aligned(8) param;
>   	int i;
>   
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(param.ent) < sizeof(void *));

Considering we used 'unsigned long long regs' before, should
the above BUILD_BUG_ON should be
	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(param.ent) < sizeof(long long));
?

> +
> +	/* __bpf_prog_run() requires *regs as the first parameter */

This comment is not correct.

static __always_inline u32 __bpf_prog_run(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
                                           const void *ctx,
                                           bpf_dispatcher_fn dfunc)
{
	...
}

The first parameter is 'prog'.

Also there is no __bpf_prog_run() referenced in this function
so this comment may confuse readers. So I suggest removing
this comment. The same for perf_call_bpf_exit() below.

>   	*(struct pt_regs **)&param = regs;
>   	param.syscall_nr = rec->nr;
>   	for (i = 0; i < sys_data->nb_args; i++)
> @@ -657,11 +660,12 @@ static int perf_call_bpf_exit(struct trace_event_call *call, struct pt_regs *reg
>   			      struct syscall_trace_exit *rec)
>   {
>   	struct syscall_tp_t {
> -		unsigned long long regs;
> +		struct trace_entry ent;
>   		unsigned long syscall_nr;
>   		unsigned long ret;
> -	} param;
> +	} __aligned(8) param;
>   
> +	/* __bpf_prog_run() requires *regs as the first parameter */
>   	*(struct pt_regs **)&param = regs;
>   	param.syscall_nr = rec->nr;
>   	param.ret = rec->ret;

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-28 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-27 15:06 [PATCH bpf-next] tracing: perf_call_bpf: use struct trace_entry in struct syscall_tp_t Yauheni Kaliuta
2023-07-27 17:37 ` Yonghong Song
2023-07-28 10:02   ` Yauheni Kaliuta
2023-07-28 14:27   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2] " Yauheni Kaliuta
2023-07-28 16:44     ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-07-31  8:07       ` Yauheni Kaliuta
2023-07-31 18:20         ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-01  7:49           ` Yauheni Kaliuta
2023-08-01  7:52     ` [PATCH bpf-next v3] " Yauheni Kaliuta
2023-08-01 14:31       ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-01 18:00       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=225ed430-dfd1-bf0b-8481-58f5f0d3f7eb@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ykaliuta@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox