From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: Song Chen <chensong_2000@126.com>,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/lib/bpf/libbpf: Prioritize module kfuncs over vmlinux kfuncs
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 17:14:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <232803d2-cdbb-4fdf-b782-6d6f8f77d89f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430054707.38965-1-chensong_2000@126.com>
On 4/30/26 6:47 AM, Song Chen wrote:
> Change the kfunc resolution order in find_ksym_btf_id() to search
> module BTFs before vmlinux BTF. This allows kernel modules to override
> vmlinux kfuncs with the same name, enabling a form of live-patching
> for kfuncs.
>
> Previously, vmlinux kfuncs were always preferred, making it impossible
> for modules to provide enhanced or fixed versions of existing kfuncs.
> With this change, modules can now override kernel kfuncs, while
> programs that don't use module BTFs remain unaffected.
>
> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Chen <chensong_2000@126.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 0be7017800fe..9c308930bddb 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -8538,29 +8538,31 @@ static int find_ksym_btf_id(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *ksym_name,
> {
> struct module_btf *mod_btf;
> struct btf *btf;
> - int i, id, err;
> + int i, id = 0, err;
nit: I think you can keep id uninitialized, it's set below
unconditionally.
>
> - btf = obj->btf_vmlinux;
> mod_btf = NULL;
nit: It looks like you don't need setting mod_btf to NULL here,
both code paths set it anyway.
> - id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, ksym_name, kind);
>
> - if (id == -ENOENT) {
> - err = load_module_btfs(obj);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + err = load_module_btfs(obj);
> + if (err)
> + goto search_vmlinux;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < obj->btf_module_cnt; i++) {
> - /* we assume module_btf's BTF FD is always >0 */
> - mod_btf = &obj->btf_modules[i];
> - btf = mod_btf->btf;
> - id = btf__find_by_name_kind_own(btf, ksym_name, kind);
> - if (id != -ENOENT)
> - break;
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < obj->btf_module_cnt; i++) {
> + /* we assume module_btf's BTF FD is always >0 */
> + mod_btf = &obj->btf_modules[i];
> + btf = mod_btf->btf;
> + id = btf__find_by_name_kind_own(btf, ksym_name, kind);
> + if (id != -ENOENT)
> + goto found;
very nit: Perhaps setting *res_btf and *res_mod_btf here inline
and return will make code a bit easier to follow and allow
removing found label.
Overall it looks like the refactoring looks correct, module
btf is processed before the vmlinux btf.
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> }
> - if (id <= 0)
> +
> +search_vmlinux:
> + btf = obj->btf_vmlinux;
> + mod_btf = NULL;
> + id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, ksym_name, kind);
> + if (id == -ENOENT)
> return -ESRCH;
>
> +found:
> *res_btf = btf;
> *res_mod_btf = mod_btf;
> return id;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 5:47 [PATCH 1/2] tools/lib/bpf/libbpf: Prioritize module kfuncs over vmlinux kfuncs Song Chen
2026-05-07 16:14 ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=232803d2-cdbb-4fdf-b782-6d6f8f77d89f@gmail.com \
--to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chensong_2000@126.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox