From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] bpf: test_run: Use system page pool for XDP live frame mode
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 18:34:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2746b1d9-2e1f-4e66-89ed-19949a189a92@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220210342.40267-3-toke@redhat.com>
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:03:39 +0100
> The BPF_TEST_RUN code in XDP live frame mode creates a new page pool
> each time it is called and uses that to allocate the frames used for the
> XDP run. This works well if the syscall is used with a high repetitions
> number, as it allows for efficient page recycling. However, if used with
> a small number of repetitions, the overhead of creating and tearing down
> the page pool is significant, and can even lead to system stalls if the
> syscall is called in a tight loop.
>
> Now that we have a persistent system page pool instance, it becomes
> pretty straight forward to change the test_run code to use it. The only
> wrinkle is that we can no longer rely on a custom page init callback
> from page_pool itself; instead, we change the test_run code to write a
> random cookie value to the beginning of the page as an indicator that
> the page has been initialised and can be re-used without copying the
> initial data again.
>
> The cookie is a random 128-bit value, which means the probability that
> we will get accidental collisions (which would lead to recycling the
> wrong page values and reading garbage) is on the order of 2^-128. This
> is in the "won't happen before the heat death of the universe" range, so
> this marking is safe for the intended usage.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Hey,
What's the status of this series, now that the window is open?
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 21:03 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Change BPF_TEST_RUN use the system page pool for live XDP frames Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-20 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: Register system page pool as an XDP memory model Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-04-03 20:20 ` John Fastabend
2024-04-04 9:08 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-02-20 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] bpf: test_run: Use system page pool for XDP live frame mode Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-21 14:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-04-04 11:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-04-04 13:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-04-03 16:34 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2024-04-03 20:39 ` John Fastabend
2024-04-04 11:43 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-04-04 13:09 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-02-20 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] bpf: test_run: Fix cacheline alignment of live XDP frame data structures Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-21 14:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Change BPF_TEST_RUN use the system page pool for live XDP frames Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2746b1d9-2e1f-4e66-89ed-19949a189a92@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox