BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1] net: adjust net_device layout for cacheline usage
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:51:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2836dccc-faa9-3bb6-c4d5-dd60c75b275a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161168277983.410784.12401225493601624417.stgit@firesoul>

On 1/26/21 10:39 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> The current layout of net_device is not optimal for cacheline usage.
> 
> The member adj_list.lower linked list is split between cacheline 2 and 3.
> The ifindex is placed together with stats (struct net_device_stats),
> although most modern drivers don't update this stats member.
> 
> The members netdev_ops, mtu and hard_header_len are placed on three
> different cachelines. These members are accessed for XDP redirect into
> devmap, which were noticeably with perf tool. When not using the map
> redirect variant (like TC-BPF does), then ifindex is also used, which is
> placed on a separate fourth cacheline. These members are also accessed
> during forwarding with regular network stack. The members priv_flags and
> flags are on fast-path for network stack transmit path in __dev_queue_xmit
> (currently located together with mtu cacheline).
> 
> This patch creates a read mostly cacheline, with the purpose of keeping the
> above mentioned members on the same cacheline.
> 
> Some netdev_features_t members also becomes part of this cacheline, which is
> on purpose, as function netif_skb_features() is on fast-path via
> validate_xmit_skb().

A long over due look at the organization of this struct. Do you have
performance numbers for the XDP case?


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-26 17:39 [PATCH net-next V1] net: adjust net_device layout for cacheline usage Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-01-29  3:51 ` David Ahern [this message]
2021-01-29  7:58   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found]     ` <20210129114642.139cb7dc@carbon>
2021-01-29 19:35       ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-29 19:47         ` Eric Dumazet
2021-01-29 20:07           ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-12 15:57             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-01-29  4:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
     [not found] ` <52835f1f-96e1-b36e-2631-1182649ac3a8@gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <20210129150058.34e3a855@carbon>
2021-02-12 15:49     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2836dccc-faa9-3bb6-c4d5-dd60c75b275a@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox