From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Yury Namgung <ynamgung@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT_* in ns_current_pid_tgid test
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 08:30:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2af81b55-4be4-4936-a42e-940786c45877@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZfgnLQ5ytpU2IcUX@krava>
On 3/18/24 4:36 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:48:59AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> Replace CHECK in selftest ns_current_pid_tgid with recommended ASSERT_* style.
>> I also shortened subtest name as the prefix of subtest name is covered
>> by the test name already.
>>
>> This patch does fix a testing issue. Currently even if bss->user_{pid,tgid}
>> is not correct, the test still passed since the clone func returns 0.
>> I fixed it to return a non-zero value if bss->user_{pid,tgid} is incorrect.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> .../bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c | 36 ++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
>> index 24d493482ffc..3a0664a86243 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
>> @@ -20,19 +20,19 @@ static int test_current_pid_tgid(void *args)
>> {
>> struct test_ns_current_pid_tgid__bss *bss;
>> struct test_ns_current_pid_tgid *skel;
>> - int err = -1, duration = 0;
>> + int ret = -1, err;
>> pid_t tgid, pid;
>> struct stat st;
>>
>> skel = test_ns_current_pid_tgid__open_and_load();
>> - if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open_load", "failed to load skeleton\n"))
>> - goto cleanup;
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_ns_current_pid_tgid__open_and_load"))
>> + goto out;
> you could just return in here so there's no need for the out label
> otherwise lgtm
Since this patch intends to just replace CHECK with ASSERT_*.
I tried to keep other parts of codes the same as before. But
I can certainly do this. I will wait for other comments
before sending another revision.
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>
>
> jirka
>
>>
>> pid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
>> tgid = getpid();
>>
>> err = stat("/proc/self/ns/pid", &st);
>> - if (CHECK(err, "stat", "failed /proc/self/ns/pid: %d\n", err))
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "stat /proc/self/ns/pid"))
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> bss = skel->bss;
>> @@ -42,24 +42,26 @@ static int test_current_pid_tgid(void *args)
>> bss->user_tgid = 0;
>>
>> err = test_ns_current_pid_tgid__attach(skel);
>> - if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ns_current_pid_tgid__attach"))
>> goto cleanup;
>>
>> /* trigger tracepoint */
>> usleep(1);
>> - ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_pid, pid, "pid");
>> - ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_tgid, tgid, "tgid");
>> - err = 0;
>> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_pid, pid, "pid"))
>> + goto cleanup;
>> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_tgid, tgid, "tgid"))
>> + goto cleanup;
>> + ret = 0;
>>
>> cleanup:
>> - test_ns_current_pid_tgid__destroy(skel);
>> -
>> - return err;
>> + test_ns_current_pid_tgid__destroy(skel);
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> }
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-15 18:48 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Allow helper bpf_get_[ns_]current_pid_tgid() for all prog types Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] " Yonghong Song
2024-03-18 12:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-15 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT_* in ns_current_pid_tgid test Yonghong Song
2024-03-18 11:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-18 15:30 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-03-19 21:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-20 0:52 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 20:15 ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] selftests/bpf: Refactor out some functions " Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add a cgroup prog bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid() test Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a sk_msg " Yonghong Song
2024-03-19 21:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Allow helper bpf_get_[ns_]current_pid_tgid() for all prog types patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2af81b55-4be4-4936-a42e-940786c45877@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=ynamgung@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox