BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Yury Namgung <ynamgung@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT_* in ns_current_pid_tgid test
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 08:30:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2af81b55-4be4-4936-a42e-940786c45877@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZfgnLQ5ytpU2IcUX@krava>


On 3/18/24 4:36 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:48:59AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> Replace CHECK in selftest ns_current_pid_tgid with recommended ASSERT_* style.
>> I also shortened subtest name as the prefix of subtest name is covered
>> by the test name already.
>>
>> This patch does fix a testing issue. Currently even if bss->user_{pid,tgid}
>> is not correct, the test still passed since the clone func returns 0.
>> I fixed it to return a non-zero value if bss->user_{pid,tgid} is incorrect.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   .../bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c      | 36 ++++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
>> index 24d493482ffc..3a0664a86243 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
>> @@ -20,19 +20,19 @@ static int test_current_pid_tgid(void *args)
>>   {
>>   	struct test_ns_current_pid_tgid__bss  *bss;
>>   	struct test_ns_current_pid_tgid *skel;
>> -	int err = -1, duration = 0;
>> +	int ret = -1, err;
>>   	pid_t tgid, pid;
>>   	struct stat st;
>>   
>>   	skel = test_ns_current_pid_tgid__open_and_load();
>> -	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open_load", "failed to load skeleton\n"))
>> -		goto cleanup;
>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_ns_current_pid_tgid__open_and_load"))
>> +		goto out;
> you could just return in here so there's no need for the out label
> otherwise lgtm

Since this patch intends to just replace CHECK with ASSERT_*.
I tried to keep other parts of codes the same as before. But
I can certainly do this. I will wait for other comments
before sending another revision.

>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>
>
> jirka
>
>>   
>>   	pid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
>>   	tgid = getpid();
>>   
>>   	err = stat("/proc/self/ns/pid", &st);
>> -	if (CHECK(err, "stat", "failed /proc/self/ns/pid: %d\n", err))
>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "stat /proc/self/ns/pid"))
>>   		goto cleanup;
>>   
>>   	bss = skel->bss;
>> @@ -42,24 +42,26 @@ static int test_current_pid_tgid(void *args)
>>   	bss->user_tgid = 0;
>>   
>>   	err = test_ns_current_pid_tgid__attach(skel);
>> -	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_ns_current_pid_tgid__attach"))
>>   		goto cleanup;
>>   
>>   	/* trigger tracepoint */
>>   	usleep(1);
>> -	ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_pid, pid, "pid");
>> -	ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_tgid, tgid, "tgid");
>> -	err = 0;
>> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_pid, pid, "pid"))
>> +		goto cleanup;
>> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bss->user_tgid, tgid, "tgid"))
>> +		goto cleanup;
>> +	ret = 0;
>>   
>>   cleanup:
>> -	 test_ns_current_pid_tgid__destroy(skel);
>> -
>> -	return err;
>> +	test_ns_current_pid_tgid__destroy(skel);
>> +out:
>> +	return ret;
>>   }
[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-15 18:48 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Allow helper bpf_get_[ns_]current_pid_tgid() for all prog types Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] " Yonghong Song
2024-03-18 12:37   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-15 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT_* in ns_current_pid_tgid test Yonghong Song
2024-03-18 11:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-18 15:30     ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-03-19 21:52       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-20  0:52         ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-21 20:15         ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] selftests/bpf: Refactor out some functions " Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add a cgroup prog bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid() test Yonghong Song
2024-03-15 18:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a sk_msg " Yonghong Song
2024-03-19 21:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Allow helper bpf_get_[ns_]current_pid_tgid() for all prog types patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2af81b55-4be4-4936-a42e-940786c45877@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=ynamgung@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox