From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: syzbot+237bbeed8dfe0699b7f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org, toke@redhat.com,
lorenzo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martin.lau@kernel.org, clm@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: free page_pool frags via the page_pool path in bpf_xdp_shrink_data
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 13:16:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c2c7bb6-cce5-4dc3-965c-bbf1c50905d9@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5aa97a9a0b8cd20feda29b304874967a8019d8b4b3dd4021dc5c0dac43c10d05@mail.kernel.org>
On 8/16/26 11:57 AM, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>> index 16845987b244..3aab5556abe2 100644
>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
>> #include <net/inet_dscp.h>
>>
>> #include "dev.h"
>> +#include "netmem_priv.h"
>>
>> /* Keep the struct bpf_fib_lookup small so that it fits into a cacheline */
>> static_assert(sizeof(struct bpf_fib_lookup) == 64, "struct bpf_fib_lookup size check");
>> @@ -4288,6 +4289,14 @@ static bool bpf_xdp_shrink_data(struct xdp_buff *xdp, skb_frag_t *frag,
>> if (mem_type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL) {
>> netmem = 0;
>> zc_frag = bpf_xdp_shrink_data_zc(xdp, shrink, tail, release);
>> + } else if (netmem_is_pp(netmem)) {
>> + /* The rxq mem model does not always describe how a released
>> + * frag must be freed: the generic-XDP and veth paths run the
>> + * program on a shared rxq while the frag has been cow'd into
>> + * page_pool memory. Trust the page itself and return a
>> + * page_pool frag to its pool regardless of rxq->mem.type.
>> + */
>> + mem_type = MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL;
>> }
>>
>> if (release) {
> The comment says the fix handles rxq->mem.type "regardless" of its value,
> but the implementation still checks MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL first. When the
> shared rxq has been left with mem_type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL by
> veth_xdp_rcv_one() (which writes frame->mem_type into the shared rxq on
> XDP_TX/XDP_REDIRECT and never restores it), a page_pool frag skips the new
> netmem_is_pp() branch entirely and goes to bpf_xdp_shrink_data_zc() instead.
>
> Should the comment say "regardless of rxq->mem.type, unless the rxq claims
> XSK memory" or should the netmem_is_pp() test be unconditional so the stale
> MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL case is also handled?
>
> The commit message states: "A single rxq->mem.type can be wrong in either
> direction." The code, however, only corrects one direction: it upgrades
> mem_type to MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL when the frag is a page_pool page, but it
> never downgrades when rxq->mem.type already says MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL and the
> frag is not a page_pool page.
>
> That second direction is reachable on the very path the commit message
> cites. veth_xdp_rcv_one() (drivers/net/veth.c:638) points the buff at the
> shared rxq and then, on XDP_TX/XDP_REDIRECT, writes the frame's type into
> it:
>
> xdp->rxq = &rq->xdp_rxq;
> ...
> case XDP_TX:
> xdp->rxq->mem.type = frame->mem_type;
> case XDP_REDIRECT:
> xdp->rxq->mem.type = frame->mem_type;
>
> Once one redirected frame with mem_type == MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL is TX'd or
> redirected, rq->xdp_rxq.mem.type stays MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL for every
> subsequent packet on that queue.
>
> A later frame whose frags are plain pages then reaches:
>
> } else if (netmem_is_pp(netmem)) { /* false, mem_type left as PAGE_POOL */
> ...
> __xdp_return(netmem, mem_type, false, zc_frag);
>
> and __xdp_return()'s MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL arm (net/core/xdp.c:436-446) skips
> the check and dereferences a garbage pool pointer:
>
> /* No need to check netmem_is_pp() as mem->type knows this a page_pool page */
> page_pool_put_full_netmem(netmem_get_pp(netmem), netmem, napi_direct);
>
> netmem_get_pp() reads page->pp, which for a non-page_pool page holds
> whatever the allocator left there.
>
> This specific crash is pre-existing rather than introduced by the patch, but
> the patch is the change that claims to make the frag itself authoritative,
> and it had the netmem in hand. Could the decision be unconditional:
>
> } else {
> mem_type = netmem_is_pp(netmem) ? MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL : mem_type;
This is a non-pool page being mistreated as a pool page, and I think
it's a separate issue, xdp_return_buff and xdp_convert_buff_to_frame hit
it too, not just this path.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-16 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 3:12 [PATCH bpf] bpf: free page_pool frags via the page_pool path in bpf_xdp_shrink_data Jiayuan Chen
2026-08-16 3:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-16 5:10 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-08-16 3:57 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-16 5:16 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c2c7bb6-cce5-4dc3-965c-bbf1c50905d9@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+237bbeed8dfe0699b7f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox