From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/9] bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:26:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <306399911fc4b6241ac6fac7a36eb564210eee15.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240827194834.1423815-4-martin.lau@linux.dev>
On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 12:48 -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> This patch adds a .gen_epilogue to the bpf_verifier_ops. It is similar
> to the existing .gen_prologue. Instead of allowing a subsystem
> to run code at the beginning of a bpf prog, it allows the subsystem
> to run code just before the bpf prog exit.
>
> One of the use case is to allow the upcoming bpf qdisc to ensure that
> the skb->dev is the same as the qdisc->dev_queue->dev. The bpf qdisc
> struct_ops implementation could either fix it up or drop the skb.
> Another use case could be in bpf_tcp_ca.c to enforce snd_cwnd
> has sane value (e.g. non zero).
>
> The epilogue can do the useful thing (like checking skb->dev) if it
> can access the bpf prog's ctx. Unlike prologue, r1 may not hold the
> ctx pointer. This patch saves the r1 in the stack if the .gen_epilogue
> has returned some instructions in the "epilogue_buf".
>
> The existing .gen_prologue is done in convert_ctx_accesses().
> The new .gen_epilogue is done in the convert_ctx_accesses() also.
> When it sees the (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT) instruction, it will be patched
> with the earlier generated "epilogue_buf". The epilogue patching is
> only done for the main prog.
>
> Only one epilogue will be patched to the main program. When the
> bpf prog has multiple BPF_EXIT instructions, a BPF_JA is used
> to goto the earlier patched epilogue. Majority of the archs
> support (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA): x86, arm, s390, risv64, loongarch,
> powerpc and arc. This patch keeps it simple and always
> use (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA).
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> ---
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
[...]
> @@ -19740,6 +19764,26 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> insn->code = BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC | BPF_SIZE(insn->code);
> env->prog->aux->num_exentries++;
> continue;
> + } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT) &&
> + epilogue_cnt &&
> + i + delta < subprogs[1].start) {
> + /* Generate epilogue for the main prog */
> + if (epilogue_idx) {
> + /* jump back to the earlier generated epilogue */
> + insn_buf[0] = BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JA, 0,
> + epilogue_idx - i - delta - 1, 0);
Nit: maybe add BPF_GOTOL macro or mention that this is a 'gotol' instruction in the comment?
(this is how it is called in llvm).
> + cnt = 1;
> + } else {
> + memcpy(insn_buf, epilogue_buf,
> + epilogue_cnt * sizeof(*epilogue_buf));
> + cnt = epilogue_cnt;
> + /* epilogue_idx cannot be 0. It must have at
> + * least one ctx ptr saving insn before the
> + * epilogue.
> + */
> + epilogue_idx = i + delta;
> + }
> + goto patch_insn_buf;
> } else {
> continue;
> }
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 19:48 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/9] bpf: Move insn_buf[16] to bpf_verifier_env Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 0:41 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-29 1:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-29 15:20 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 15:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-29 15:33 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/9] bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 2:26 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-08-29 15:47 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/9] bpf: Export bpf_base_func_proto Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 5/9] selftests/bpf: attach struct_ops maps before test prog runs Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 6/9] selftests/bpf: Test gen_prologue and gen_epilogue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 7:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-29 17:35 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tailcall epilogue test Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 6:16 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-29 18:15 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: A pro/epilogue test when the main prog jumps back to the 1st insn Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 6:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-27 19:48 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Test epilogue patching when the main prog has multiple BPF_EXIT Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-28 0:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 6:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-29 20:09 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-29 6:25 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-27 19:52 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/9] bpf: Adjust BPF_JMP that jumps to the 1st insn of the prologue Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-28 16:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-28 17:44 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-28 18:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-28 18:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau
[not found] ` <20240827194834.1423815-3-martin.lau@linux.dev>
2024-08-29 2:01 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=306399911fc4b6241ac6fac7a36eb564210eee15.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox