BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev	 <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	bpf	 <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: add option to force-anonymize nested structs for BTF dump
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 11:35:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3071012cc1e8d6bdf16b13d371a12cb201c502a7.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae6c6e50b3176d4ee4cce4cda09807a05d103fbf.camel@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2025-12-17 at 11:34 -0800, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-12-17 at 18:41 +0000, Alan Maguire wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > So maybe the best we can do here is something like the following at the top
> > of vmlinux.h:
> > 
> > #ifndef BPF_USE_MS_EXTENSIONS
> > #if __has_builtin(__builtin_FUNCSIG) || defined(_MSC_EXTENSIONS)
> > #define BPF_USE_MS_EXTENSIONS
> > #endif
> > #endif
> > 
> > ...and then guard using #ifdef BPF_USE_MS_EXTENSIONS
> > 
> > That will work on clang and perhaps at some point work on gcc, but also
> > gives the user the option to supply a macro to force use in cases where
> > there is no detection available.
> 
> Are we sure we need such flexibility?
> Maybe just stick with current implementation and unroll the structures
> unconditionally?

I mean, the point of the extension is to make the code smaller.
But here we are expanding it instead, so why bother?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-17 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-16 17:18 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Handle -fms-extension in kernel structs Alan Maguire
2025-12-16 17:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: add option to force-anonymize nested structs for BTF dump Alan Maguire
2025-12-16 19:00   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-16 19:08     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-12-16 19:46     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 16:06       ` Alan Maguire
2025-12-17 16:12         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-17 17:06           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-12-17 17:33             ` Alan Maguire
2025-12-17 17:52               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-17 18:41                 ` Alan Maguire
2025-12-17 19:34                   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 19:35                     ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-12-17 20:50                       ` Alan Maguire
2025-12-17 21:02                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-12-17 21:27                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-17 22:34                             ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 22:47                               ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 23:34                                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-18  0:19                                   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-18  0:39                                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-18  0:50                                       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 23:52                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-12-18  0:49                               ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-12-17 17:10         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-12-16 17:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpftool: force-anonymize structs to avoid need for -fms-extension Alan Maguire
2025-12-16 19:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Handle -fms-extension in kernel structs Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3071012cc1e8d6bdf16b13d371a12cb201c502a7.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox