From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3A3C180A9F; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719404203; cv=none; b=BsS+H0hJEpDyIGwc4T/2Mlx+XyAW8G9+1t48u9pW0NXse0112SSRIxI9xs6FrO5PPulOynd82U/0RfXpAFPtZVJOLpFv5vgZsGKgrdcAyQ5TBIJ8VC+KIttB/MZVU1Rk53pxUFjTwtKf497hXtXWuGhs3hAb7zXw52vnBemOVTQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719404203; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4DszoVEDIpfg/zVHuUM0BCgw6hDTH3itrr355aASaOY=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=f6rAYv/VgzpC7GzCH7Hh1eRWd2kt9xpLhayvILNeOmuTamDMwPr1V2AvNdRVjy6oBK2/KJJd7fnYpRxcuPu81hCO2lloF9DtNB6TDX/1QB1CH2R/ZbfnQgltlIT+ntVCTqdH+laBD3zL2maAiP+/nH4Rhn/jb2FQrGJsdhrGwyc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.252]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W8LDD4WfdzZcJ1; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:12:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.61]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03721180086; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:16:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.69.30.204] (10.69.30.204) by dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:16:36 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/13] First try to replace page_frag with page_frag_cache To: Alexander Duyck , Jakub Kicinski CC: , , , , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , , , References: <20240625135216.47007-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20240625162700.56587db3@kernel.org> From: Yunsheng Lin Message-ID: <3101f982-f520-ec00-b0ef-d558f208d9a0@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:16:36 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) On 2024/6/26 7:41, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:27 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> >> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:52:03 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: >>> V9: >>> 1. Add check for test_alloc_len and change perm of module_param() >>> to 0 as Wang Wei' comment. >>> 2. Rebased on latest net-next. >> >> Please do not post a new version until you get feedback from Alex >> on the previous one. This series consumes all our CI resources, >> we can't get important patches tested :| > > Sorry, I didn't realize this patch set was waiting on feedback from > me. I will try to get to it as time permits. Maybe a day or two as I > have been swamped this week with various fbnic related items. Ok, it would be good to have some feedback from you, thanks. > > Thanks, > > - Alex > . >