Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next] mptcp: Add struct mptcp_sock definition when CONFIG_MPTCP is disabled

[Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, Jiri Olsa wrote:

> The btf_sock_ids array needs struct mptcp_sock BTF ID for
> the bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock helper.
>
> When CONFIG_MPTCP is disabled, the 'struct mptcp_sock' is not
> defined and resolve_btfids will complain with:
>
>  BTFIDS  vmlinux
> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol mptcp_sock
>
> Adding empty difinition for struct mptcp_sock when CONFIG_MPTCP
> is disabled.
>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

Thanks Jiri, v2 looks good to merge in bpf-next:

Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>


> ---
> include/net/mptcp.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> v2 changes:
>  - moved the new empty struct declaration next to the inline
>    bpf_mptcp_sock_from_subflow function [Mat]
>
> diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
> index ac9cf7271d46..412479ebf5ad 100644
> --- a/include/net/mptcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
> @@ -291,4 +291,8 @@ struct mptcp_sock *bpf_mptcp_sock_from_subflow(struct sock *sk);
> static inline struct mptcp_sock *bpf_mptcp_sock_from_subflow(struct sock *sk) { return NULL; }
> #endif
>
> +#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP)
> +struct mptcp_sock { };
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* __NET_MPTCP_H */
> -- 
> 2.37.1
>
>

--
Mat Martineau
Intel