* [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data failure with 64K page
@ 2026-01-20 21:09 Yonghong Song
2026-01-20 21:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_pull_data " Yonghong Song
2026-01-22 8:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data " Alan Maguire
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2026-01-20 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
Martin KaFai Lau, Amery Hung
On arm64 systems with 64K pages, the selftest task_local_data has the following
failures:
...
test_task_local_data_basic:PASS:tld_create_key 0 nsec
test_task_local_data_basic:FAIL:tld_create_key unexpected tld_create_key: actual 0 != expected -28
...
test_task_local_data_basic_thread:PASS:run task_main 0 nsec
test_task_local_data_basic_thread:FAIL:task_main retval unexpected error: 2 (errno 0)
test_task_local_data_basic_thread:FAIL:tld_get_data value0 unexpected tld_get_data value0: actual 0 != expected 6268
...
#447/1 task_local_data/task_local_data_basic:FAIL
...
#447/2 task_local_data/task_local_data_race:FAIL
#447 task_local_data:FAIL
When TLD_DYN_DATA_SIZE is 64K page size, for
struct tld_meta_u {
_Atomic __u8 cnt;
__u16 size;
struct tld_metadata metadata[];
};
fields 'cnt' and 'size' would overflow. For example,
for 4K page, 'cnt' will be 4096/64 = 64. But for 64K page,
'cnt' will be 65536/64 = 1024 and 'cnt' is not enough for 1024.
For field 'size', it is okay for value 4K, but it is not enough
for 64K as maximum 'size' value is '64K - 1'.
To accommodate 64K page, '_Atomic __u8 cnt' becomes '_Atomic __u16 cnt'
and '__u16 size' becomes '__u32 size'. A few other places are adjusted
accordingly.
Cc: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h | 6 +++---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h
index 2de38776a2d4..4c38f9a7bc90 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ struct tld_metadata {
};
struct tld_meta_u {
- _Atomic __u8 cnt;
- __u16 size;
+ _Atomic __u16 cnt;
+ __u32 size;
struct tld_metadata metadata[];
};
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int __tld_init_data_p(int map_fd)
static tld_key_t __tld_create_key(const char *name, size_t size, bool dyn_data)
{
int err, i, sz, off = 0;
- __u8 cnt;
+ __u16 cnt;
if (!TLD_READ_ONCE(tld_meta_p)) {
err = __tld_init_meta_p();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c
index 9fd6306b455c..cc4d49222d9d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#define TLD_FREE_DATA_ON_THREAD_EXIT
-#define TLD_DYN_DATA_SIZE 4096
+#define TLD_DYN_DATA_SIZE getpagesize()
#include "task_local_data.h"
struct test_tld_struct {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h
index 432fff2af844..e13f239b46b0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ struct tld_metadata {
};
struct tld_meta_u {
- __u8 cnt;
- __u16 size;
+ __u16 cnt;
+ __u32 size;
struct tld_metadata metadata[TLD_MAX_DATA_CNT];
};
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_pull_data failure with 64K page 2026-01-20 21:09 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data failure with 64K page Yonghong Song @ 2026-01-20 21:09 ` Yonghong Song 2026-01-22 11:02 ` Alan Maguire 2026-01-22 8:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data " Alan Maguire 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Yonghong Song @ 2026-01-20 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau, Amery Hung If the argument 'pull_len' of run_test() is 'PULL_MAX' or 'PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE', the eventual pull_len size will close to the page size. On arm64 systems with 64K pages, the pull_len size will be close to 64K. But the existing buffer will be close to 9000 which is not enough to pull. So for 64K page size and selective run_tests(), increase buff size from 9000 to 90000 to ensure enough buffer space to pull. Cc: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c index efa350d04ec5..32ac99406d28 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #define PULL_PLUS_ONE (1 << 30) #define XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM 256 +#define PAGE_SIZE_64K 65536 /* Find headroom and tailroom occupied by struct xdp_frame and struct * skb_shared_info so that we can calculate the maximum pull lengths for @@ -114,12 +115,17 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) { u32 pg_sz, max_meta_len, max_data_len; struct test_xdp_pull_data *skel; + int buff_len; skel = test_xdp_pull_data__open_and_load(); if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_xdp_pull_data__open_and_load")) return; pg_sz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); + if (pg_sz == PAGE_SIZE_64K) + buff_len = 90000; + else + buff_len = 9000; if (find_xdp_sizes(skel, pg_sz)) goto out; @@ -140,13 +146,13 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, 1025, 1025); /* multi-buf pkt, empty linear data area, pull requires memmove */ - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, 0, PULL_MAX); + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, 0, PULL_MAX); /* multi-buf pkt, no headroom */ - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, max_meta_len, 1024, PULL_MAX); + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, max_meta_len, 1024, PULL_MAX); /* multi-buf pkt, no tailroom, pull requires memmove */ - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, max_data_len, PULL_MAX); + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, max_data_len, PULL_MAX); /* Test cases with invalid pull length */ @@ -154,7 +160,7 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 2048, 0, 2048, 2049); /* multi-buf pkt with no space left in linear data area */ - run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 9000, max_meta_len, max_data_len, + run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, buff_len, max_meta_len, max_data_len, PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); /* multi-buf pkt, empty linear data area */ @@ -165,7 +171,7 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); /* multi-buf pkt, no tailroom */ - run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 9000, 0, max_data_len, + run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, max_data_len, PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); out: -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_pull_data failure with 64K page 2026-01-20 21:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_pull_data " Yonghong Song @ 2026-01-22 11:02 ` Alan Maguire 2026-01-22 15:31 ` Yonghong Song 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alan Maguire @ 2026-01-22 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yonghong Song, bpf Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau, Amery Hung On 20/01/2026 21:09, Yonghong Song wrote: > If the argument 'pull_len' of run_test() is 'PULL_MAX' or > 'PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE', the eventual pull_len size > will close to the page size. On arm64 systems with 64K pages, > the pull_len size will be close to 64K. But the existing buffer > will be close to 9000 which is not enough to pull. > > So for 64K page size and selective run_tests(), increase > buff size from 9000 to 90000 to ensure enough buffer space > to pull. > > Cc: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> one optional suggestion below.. > --- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c | 16 +++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c > index efa350d04ec5..32ac99406d28 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > #define PULL_PLUS_ONE (1 << 30) > > #define XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM 256 > +#define PAGE_SIZE_64K 65536 > > /* Find headroom and tailroom occupied by struct xdp_frame and struct > * skb_shared_info so that we can calculate the maximum pull lengths for > @@ -114,12 +115,17 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) > { > u32 pg_sz, max_meta_len, max_data_len; > struct test_xdp_pull_data *skel; > + int buff_len; > > skel = test_xdp_pull_data__open_and_load(); > if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_xdp_pull_data__open_and_load")) > return; > > pg_sz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); > + if (pg_sz == PAGE_SIZE_64K) > + buff_len = 90000; > + else > + buff_len = 9000; > nit: should we generalize here and just use 1.5 * pg_sz; i.e. buff_len = pg_sz + (pg_sz/2); that would eliminate the need for the 64k page size #define. > if (find_xdp_sizes(skel, pg_sz)) > goto out; > @@ -140,13 +146,13 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) > run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, 1025, 1025); > > /* multi-buf pkt, empty linear data area, pull requires memmove */ > - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, 0, PULL_MAX); > + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, 0, PULL_MAX); > > /* multi-buf pkt, no headroom */ > - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, max_meta_len, 1024, PULL_MAX); > + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, max_meta_len, 1024, PULL_MAX); > > /* multi-buf pkt, no tailroom, pull requires memmove */ > - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, max_data_len, PULL_MAX); > + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, max_data_len, PULL_MAX); > > /* Test cases with invalid pull length */ > > @@ -154,7 +160,7 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) > run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 2048, 0, 2048, 2049); > > /* multi-buf pkt with no space left in linear data area */ > - run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 9000, max_meta_len, max_data_len, > + run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, buff_len, max_meta_len, max_data_len, > PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); > > /* multi-buf pkt, empty linear data area */ > @@ -165,7 +171,7 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) > PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); > > /* multi-buf pkt, no tailroom */ > - run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 9000, 0, max_data_len, > + run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, max_data_len, > PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); > > out: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_pull_data failure with 64K page 2026-01-22 11:02 ` Alan Maguire @ 2026-01-22 15:31 ` Yonghong Song 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Yonghong Song @ 2026-01-22 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Maguire, bpf Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau, Amery Hung On 1/22/26 3:02 AM, Alan Maguire wrote: > On 20/01/2026 21:09, Yonghong Song wrote: >> If the argument 'pull_len' of run_test() is 'PULL_MAX' or >> 'PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE', the eventual pull_len size >> will close to the page size. On arm64 systems with 64K pages, >> the pull_len size will be close to 64K. But the existing buffer >> will be close to 9000 which is not enough to pull. >> >> So for 64K page size and selective run_tests(), increase >> buff size from 9000 to 90000 to ensure enough buffer space >> to pull. >> >> Cc: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> > Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> > > one optional suggestion below.. > > >> --- >> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c | 16 +++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c >> index efa350d04ec5..32ac99406d28 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_pull_data.c >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ >> #define PULL_PLUS_ONE (1 << 30) >> >> #define XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM 256 >> +#define PAGE_SIZE_64K 65536 >> >> /* Find headroom and tailroom occupied by struct xdp_frame and struct >> * skb_shared_info so that we can calculate the maximum pull lengths for >> @@ -114,12 +115,17 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) >> { >> u32 pg_sz, max_meta_len, max_data_len; >> struct test_xdp_pull_data *skel; >> + int buff_len; >> >> skel = test_xdp_pull_data__open_and_load(); >> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_xdp_pull_data__open_and_load")) >> return; >> >> pg_sz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); >> + if (pg_sz == PAGE_SIZE_64K) >> + buff_len = 90000; >> + else >> + buff_len = 9000; >> > nit: should we generalize here and just use 1.5 * pg_sz; i.e. > > buff_len = pg_sz + (pg_sz/2); > > that would eliminate the need for the 64k page size #define. Thanks for suggestion! This indeed simpler. Will make the change in v2. > >> if (find_xdp_sizes(skel, pg_sz)) >> goto out; >> @@ -140,13 +146,13 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) >> run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, 1025, 1025); >> >> /* multi-buf pkt, empty linear data area, pull requires memmove */ >> - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, 0, PULL_MAX); >> + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, 0, PULL_MAX); >> >> /* multi-buf pkt, no headroom */ >> - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, max_meta_len, 1024, PULL_MAX); >> + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, max_meta_len, 1024, PULL_MAX); >> >> /* multi-buf pkt, no tailroom, pull requires memmove */ >> - run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, 9000, 0, max_data_len, PULL_MAX); >> + run_test(skel, XDP_PASS, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, max_data_len, PULL_MAX); >> >> /* Test cases with invalid pull length */ >> >> @@ -154,7 +160,7 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) >> run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 2048, 0, 2048, 2049); >> >> /* multi-buf pkt with no space left in linear data area */ >> - run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 9000, max_meta_len, max_data_len, >> + run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, buff_len, max_meta_len, max_data_len, >> PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); >> >> /* multi-buf pkt, empty linear data area */ >> @@ -165,7 +171,7 @@ static void test_xdp_pull_data_basic(void) >> PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); >> >> /* multi-buf pkt, no tailroom */ >> - run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, 9000, 0, max_data_len, >> + run_test(skel, XDP_DROP, pg_sz, buff_len, 0, max_data_len, >> PULL_MAX | PULL_PLUS_ONE); >> >> out: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data failure with 64K page 2026-01-20 21:09 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data failure with 64K page Yonghong Song 2026-01-20 21:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_pull_data " Yonghong Song @ 2026-01-22 8:00 ` Alan Maguire 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alan Maguire @ 2026-01-22 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yonghong Song, bpf Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau, Amery Hung On 20/01/2026 21:09, Yonghong Song wrote: > On arm64 systems with 64K pages, the selftest task_local_data has the following > failures: > ... > test_task_local_data_basic:PASS:tld_create_key 0 nsec > test_task_local_data_basic:FAIL:tld_create_key unexpected tld_create_key: actual 0 != expected -28 > ... > test_task_local_data_basic_thread:PASS:run task_main 0 nsec > test_task_local_data_basic_thread:FAIL:task_main retval unexpected error: 2 (errno 0) > test_task_local_data_basic_thread:FAIL:tld_get_data value0 unexpected tld_get_data value0: actual 0 != expected 6268 > ... > #447/1 task_local_data/task_local_data_basic:FAIL > ... > #447/2 task_local_data/task_local_data_race:FAIL > #447 task_local_data:FAIL > > When TLD_DYN_DATA_SIZE is 64K page size, for > struct tld_meta_u { > _Atomic __u8 cnt; > __u16 size; > struct tld_metadata metadata[]; > }; > fields 'cnt' and 'size' would overflow. For example, > for 4K page, 'cnt' will be 4096/64 = 64. But for 64K page, > 'cnt' will be 65536/64 = 1024 and 'cnt' is not enough for 1024. > For field 'size', it is okay for value 4K, but it is not enough > for 64K as maximum 'size' value is '64K - 1'. > > To accommodate 64K page, '_Atomic __u8 cnt' becomes '_Atomic __u16 cnt' > and '__u16 size' becomes '__u32 size'. A few other places are adjusted > accordingly. > > Cc: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h | 6 +++--- > .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h > index 2de38776a2d4..4c38f9a7bc90 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_local_data.h > @@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ struct tld_metadata { > }; > > struct tld_meta_u { > - _Atomic __u8 cnt; > - __u16 size; > + _Atomic __u16 cnt; > + __u32 size; > struct tld_metadata metadata[]; > }; > > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int __tld_init_data_p(int map_fd) > static tld_key_t __tld_create_key(const char *name, size_t size, bool dyn_data) > { > int err, i, sz, off = 0; > - __u8 cnt; > + __u16 cnt; > > if (!TLD_READ_ONCE(tld_meta_p)) { > err = __tld_init_meta_p(); > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c > index 9fd6306b455c..cc4d49222d9d 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_data.c > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > #include <test_progs.h> > > #define TLD_FREE_DATA_ON_THREAD_EXIT > -#define TLD_DYN_DATA_SIZE 4096 > +#define TLD_DYN_DATA_SIZE getpagesize() > #include "task_local_data.h" > > struct test_tld_struct { > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h > index 432fff2af844..e13f239b46b0 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_data.bpf.h > @@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ struct tld_metadata { > }; > > struct tld_meta_u { > - __u8 cnt; > - __u16 size; > + __u16 cnt; > + __u32 size; > struct tld_metadata metadata[TLD_MAX_DATA_CNT]; > }; > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-22 15:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-01-20 21:09 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data failure with 64K page Yonghong Song 2026-01-20 21:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_pull_data " Yonghong Song 2026-01-22 11:02 ` Alan Maguire 2026-01-22 15:31 ` Yonghong Song 2026-01-22 8:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix task_local_data " Alan Maguire
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox