From: Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
haoluo@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Make sure zero-len skbs aren't redirectable
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:18:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34cb2b2f-ac3b-65c4-c479-0c4ed3dda096@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y34QpET78/KX9JLh@krava>
On 11/23/22 4:23 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:03:40AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>> LWT_XMIT to test L3 case, TC to test L2 case.
>>
>> v2:
>> - s/veth_ifindex/ipip_ifindex/ in two places (Martin)
>> - add comment about which condition triggers the rejection (Martin)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
>
> hi,
> I'm getting selftest fails and it looks like it's because of this test:
>
> [root@qemu bpf]# ./test_progs -n 62,98
> #62 empty_skb:OK
> execute_one_variant:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
> execute_one_variant:PASS:my_pid_map_update 0 nsec
> libbpf: failed to determine tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event ID: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_legacy': failed to create tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_legacy': failed to auto-attach: -2
> execute_one_variant:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -2 (errno 2)
> test_legacy_printk:FAIL:legacy_case unexpected error: -2 (errno 2)
> execute_one_variant:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
> libbpf: failed to determine tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event ID: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_modern': failed to create tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_modern': failed to auto-attach: -2
> execute_one_variant:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -2 (errno 2)
> #98 legacy_printk:FAIL
>
> All error logs:
> execute_one_variant:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
> execute_one_variant:PASS:my_pid_map_update 0 nsec
> libbpf: failed to determine tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event ID: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_legacy': failed to create tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_legacy': failed to auto-attach: -2
> execute_one_variant:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -2 (errno 2)
> test_legacy_printk:FAIL:legacy_case unexpected error: -2 (errno 2)
> execute_one_variant:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
> libbpf: failed to determine tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event ID: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_modern': failed to create tracepoint 'raw_syscalls/sys_enter' perf event: No such file or directory
> libbpf: prog 'handle_modern': failed to auto-attach: -2
> execute_one_variant:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -2 (errno 2)
> #98 legacy_printk:FAIL
> Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
>
> when I run separately it passes:
>
> [root@qemu bpf]# ./test_progs -n 98
> #98 legacy_printk:OK
> Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
>
> it seems that the open_netns/close_netns does not work properly,
> and screw up access to tracefs for following tests
>
> if I comment out all the umounts in setns_by_fd, it does not fail
Agreed with the above observations.
With the current bpf-next, I can easily hit the above perf event ID issue.
But if I backout the following two patches:
68f8e3d4b916531ea3bb8b83e35138cf78f2fce5 selftests/bpf: Make sure
zero-len skbs aren't redirectable
114039b342014680911c35bd6b72624180fd669a bpf: Move skb->len == 0 checks
into __bpf_redirect
and run a few times with './test_progs -j' and I didn't hit any issues.
>
> jirka
>
>
>> ---
>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/empty_skb.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/empty_skb.c | 37 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 183 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/empty_skb.c
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/empty_skb.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/empty_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/empty_skb.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..32dd731e9070
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/empty_skb.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +#include <test_progs.h>
>> +#include <network_helpers.h>
>> +#include <net/if.h>
>> +#include "empty_skb.skel.h"
>> +
>> +#define SYS(cmd) ({ \
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(system(cmd), (cmd))) \
>> + goto out; \
>> +})
>> +
>> +void test_empty_skb(void)
>> +{
>> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattr);
>> + struct empty_skb *bpf_obj = NULL;
>> + struct nstoken *tok = NULL;
>> + struct bpf_program *prog;
>> + char eth_hlen_pp[15];
>> + char eth_hlen[14];
>> + int veth_ifindex;
>> + int ipip_ifindex;
>> + int err;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + struct {
>> + const char *msg;
>> + const void *data_in;
>> + __u32 data_size_in;
>> + int *ifindex;
>> + int err;
>> + int ret;
>> + bool success_on_tc;
>> + } tests[] = {
>> + /* Empty packets are always rejected. */
>> +
>> + {
>> + /* BPF_PROG_RUN ETH_HLEN size check */
>> + .msg = "veth empty ingress packet",
>> + .data_in = NULL,
>> + .data_size_in = 0,
>> + .ifindex = &veth_ifindex,
>> + .err = -EINVAL,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + /* BPF_PROG_RUN ETH_HLEN size check */
>> + .msg = "ipip empty ingress packet",
>> + .data_in = NULL,
>> + .data_size_in = 0,
>> + .ifindex = &ipip_ifindex,
>> + .err = -EINVAL,
>> + },
>> +
>> + /* ETH_HLEN-sized packets:
>> + * - can not be redirected at LWT_XMIT
>> + * - can be redirected at TC to non-tunneling dest
>> + */
>> +
>> + {
>> + /* __bpf_redirect_common */
>> + .msg = "veth ETH_HLEN packet ingress",
>> + .data_in = eth_hlen,
>> + .data_size_in = sizeof(eth_hlen),
>> + .ifindex = &veth_ifindex,
>> + .ret = -ERANGE,
>> + .success_on_tc = true,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + /* __bpf_redirect_no_mac
>> + *
>> + * lwt: skb->len=0 <= skb_network_offset=0
>> + * tc: skb->len=14 <= skb_network_offset=14
>> + */
>> + .msg = "ipip ETH_HLEN packet ingress",
>> + .data_in = eth_hlen,
>> + .data_size_in = sizeof(eth_hlen),
>> + .ifindex = &ipip_ifindex,
>> + .ret = -ERANGE,
>> + },
>> +
>> + /* ETH_HLEN+1-sized packet should be redirected. */
>> +
>> + {
>> + .msg = "veth ETH_HLEN+1 packet ingress",
>> + .data_in = eth_hlen_pp,
>> + .data_size_in = sizeof(eth_hlen_pp),
>> + .ifindex = &veth_ifindex,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .msg = "ipip ETH_HLEN+1 packet ingress",
>> + .data_in = eth_hlen_pp,
>> + .data_size_in = sizeof(eth_hlen_pp),
>> + .ifindex = &ipip_ifindex,
>> + },
>> + };
>> +
>> + SYS("ip netns add empty_skb");
>> + tok = open_netns("empty_skb");
>> + SYS("ip link add veth0 type veth peer veth1");
>> + SYS("ip link set dev veth0 up");
>> + SYS("ip link set dev veth1 up");
>> + SYS("ip addr add 10.0.0.1/8 dev veth0");
>> + SYS("ip addr add 10.0.0.2/8 dev veth1");
>> + veth_ifindex = if_nametoindex("veth0");
>> +
>> + SYS("ip link add ipip0 type ipip local 10.0.0.1 remote 10.0.0.2");
>> + SYS("ip link set ipip0 up");
>> + SYS("ip addr add 192.168.1.1/16 dev ipip0");
>> + ipip_ifindex = if_nametoindex("ipip0");
>> +
>> + bpf_obj = empty_skb__open_and_load();
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(bpf_obj, "open skeleton"))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
>> + bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, bpf_obj->obj) {
>> + char buf[128];
>> + bool at_tc = !strncmp(bpf_program__section_name(prog), "tc", 2);
>> +
>> + tattr.data_in = tests[i].data_in;
>> + tattr.data_size_in = tests[i].data_size_in;
>> +
>> + tattr.data_size_out = 0;
>> + bpf_obj->bss->ifindex = *tests[i].ifindex;
>> + bpf_obj->bss->ret = 0;
>> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &tattr);
>> + sprintf(buf, "err: %s [%s]", tests[i].msg, bpf_program__name(prog));
>> +
>> + if (at_tc && tests[i].success_on_tc)
>> + ASSERT_GE(err, 0, buf);
>> + else
>> + ASSERT_EQ(err, tests[i].err, buf);
>> + sprintf(buf, "ret: %s [%s]", tests[i].msg, bpf_program__name(prog));
>> + if (at_tc && tests[i].success_on_tc)
>> + ASSERT_GE(bpf_obj->bss->ret, 0, buf);
>> + else
>> + ASSERT_EQ(bpf_obj->bss->ret, tests[i].ret, buf);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + if (bpf_obj)
>> + empty_skb__destroy(bpf_obj);
>> + if (tok)
>> + close_netns(tok);
>> + system("ip netns del empty_skb");
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/empty_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/empty_skb.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..4b0cd6753251
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/empty_skb.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause
>> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
>> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
>> +
>> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>> +
>> +int ifindex;
>> +int ret;
>> +
>> +SEC("lwt_xmit")
>> +int redirect_ingress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + ret = bpf_clone_redirect(skb, ifindex, BPF_F_INGRESS);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +SEC("lwt_xmit")
>> +int redirect_egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + ret = bpf_clone_redirect(skb, ifindex, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +SEC("tc")
>> +int tc_redirect_ingress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + ret = bpf_clone_redirect(skb, ifindex, BPF_F_INGRESS);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +SEC("tc")
>> +int tc_redirect_egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + ret = bpf_clone_redirect(skb, ifindex, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 18:03 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Move skb->len == 0 checks into __bpf_redirect Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Make sure zero-len skbs aren't redirectable Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 12:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-11-23 16:18 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-11-23 17:17 ` sdf
2022-11-23 19:07 ` Yonghong Song
2022-11-23 19:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 21:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-08 16:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-09-08 17:17 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Move skb->len == 0 checks into __bpf_redirect patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34cb2b2f-ac3b-65c4-c479-0c4ed3dda096@meta.com \
--to=yhs@meta.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox