From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] bpf, test_run: fix &xdp_frame misplacement for LIVE_FRAMES
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:35:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36538615-7768-bdea-7829-6349729ab7cc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230220154627.72267-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:46:27 +0100
> &xdp_buff and &xdp_frame are bound in a way that
>
> xdp_buff->data_hard_start == xdp_frame
>
> It's always the case and e.g. xdp_convert_buff_to_frame() relies on
> this.
> IOW, the following:
>
> for (u32 i = 0; i < 0xdead; i++) {
> xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(&xdp);
> xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
> }
>
> shouldn't ever modify @xdpf's contents or the pointer itself.
> However, "live packet" code wrongly treats &xdp_frame as part of its
> context placed *before* the data_hard_start. With such flow,
> data_hard_start is sizeof(*xdpf) off to the right and no longer points
> to the XDP frame.
>
> Instead of replacing `sizeof(ctx)` with `offsetof(ctx, xdpf)` in several
> places and praying that there are no more miscalcs left somewhere in the
> code, unionize ::frm with ::data in a flex array, so that both starts
> pointing to the actual data_hard_start and the XDP frame actually starts
> being a part of it, i.e. a part of the headroom, not the context.
> A nice side effect is that the maximum frame size for this mode gets
> increased by 40 bytes, as xdp_buff::frame_sz includes everything from
> data_hard_start (-> includes xdpf already) to the end of XDP/skb shared
> info.
> Also update %MAX_PKT_SIZE accordingly in the selftests code. Leave it
> hardcoded for 64 bit && 4k pages, it can be made more flexible later on.
>
> Minor: align `&head->data` with how `head->frm` is assigned for
> consistency.
> Minor #2: rename 'frm' to 'frame' in &xdp_page_head while at it for
> clarity.
>
> (was found while testing XDP traffic generator on ice, which calls
> xdp_convert_frame_to_buff() for each XDP frame)
Sorry, maybe this could be taken directly to net-next while it's still
open? It was tested and then reverted from bpf-next only due to not 100%
compile-time assertion, which I removed in this version. No more
changes. I doubt there'll be a second PR from bpf and would like this to
hit mainline before RC1 :s
>
> Fixes: b530e9e1063e ("bpf: Add "live packet" mode for XDP in BPF_PROG_RUN")
> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230215185440.4126672-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
(>_< those two last tags are incorrect, lemme know if I should resubmit
it without them or you could do it if ok with taking it now)
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-20 15:46 [PATCH bpf-next v5] bpf, test_run: fix &xdp_frame misplacement for LIVE_FRAMES Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-21 12:35 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2023-02-21 17:52 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-02-21 17:55 ` Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36538615-7768-bdea-7829-6349729ab7cc@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox