Re: [PATCH] selftests/alsa/Makefile: fix relative rpath usage

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 8/8/24 19:00, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 02:20:21PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Wouldn't make sense to fix fix this in selftests main Makefile
>> instead of changing the all the test makefiles
> 
> As of now, the usage of rpath is localised, so it is relatively easy
> to evaluate the effect/prudence of such a change;  I am not so confident
> in imposing rpath on all of the selftests (and, if doing so, I would
> rather opt for runpath, to leave out an ability to override the search
> path via LD_LIBRARY_PATH, if such need arises);  in that case it is possibly
> also worth to add -L$(OUTPUT) to the CFLAGS as well, as the compile-time
> counterpart.  But, again, I was trying to avoid the task of evaluating
> the possible side effects of such a change, considering the variability
> in environments and setups selftests are run.

Okay.

> 
>> Same comment on all other files.
> 
>> It would be easier to send these as series
> 
> I hesitated to do so due to the fact that different selftests are seemingly
> maintained by different people.

You can cc everybody on the cover-letter explaining the change
and the individual patches can be sent selectively.

This is a kind of change it would be good to go as a series so
it will be easier for reviewers.

I had to comment on all 3 patches you sent - instead I could have
sent one reply to the cover letter. It makes it so much easier for
people to follow the discussion and add to it.

> 
>> please mentioned the tests run as well after this change.
> 
> I have checked the ldd output after the change remained the same (and that ldd
> is able to find the libraries used when run outside the directory the tests
> reside in) and did a cursory check of the results of the run of the affected
> tests

Please mention that then in the change log.

I applied this patch and ran alsa test without any issues. You
could do the same with:

make kselftest TARGETS=alsa

(but not so sure about the BPF selftests, as they don't compile as-is
> due to numerous "incompatible pointer types" warnings that are forced
> into errors by -Werror and the fact that it hanged the machine I tried
> to run them on).
> 

I see a bpf patch from you in the inbox - if you mention the issues bpf
people might be able to help you.

I am not replying to your other patches. Take these as comments on others
as well.

thanks,
-- Shuah